Evaluation of Drainage System Performance for Surface Runoff Control in Residential Areas Using the Rational Method

Authors

  • Debby Syafriyandi Universitas Esa Unggul, Indonesia
  • Desty Aulia Maharani Program Studi Rekayasa Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Dafa Al-Ghifani Program Studi Rekayasa Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Vina Purwayanti Program Studi Rekayasa Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Wa Ode Nurhaidar Program Studi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33603/jki.v14i2.11962

Keywords:

design discharge, Log Pearson Type III, residential drainage, rational Method, surface runoff

Abstract

The development of residential areas, characterized by an increase in impervious surfaces, can intensify surface runoff and increase the hydrological load on drainage systems. This condition may cause inundation when the drainage channel capacity is insufficient to convey the resulting runoff discharge. This study aims to evaluate the capacity of the existing drainage channels against the design discharge in Graha Harapan Regency Residential Area, Babelan District, Bekasi Regency. The analysis was conducted using hydrological and hydraulic approaches based on 20 years of annual maximum rainfall data. Frequency analysis was performed using the Log Pearson Type III distribution and tested using the Smirnov–Kolmogorov and Chi-Square methods. Rainfall intensity was calculated using the Mononobe equation, while the design discharge was estimated using the Rational Method. The capacity of the existing drainage channels was analyzed using Manning’s equation based on cross-sectional dimensions obtained from field surveys. The results indicate that the 25-year return period design rainfall is 195 mm/day. The design discharges for Channel 1 and Channel 2 were 0.146 m³/s and 0.147 m³/s, respectively, while their existing capacities were 0.1485 m³/s and 0.3222 m³/s, respectively. The comparison results show that the capacities of both channels exceed the corresponding design discharges, indicating that hydraulically, both channels are still capable of accommodating the 25-year return period design rainfall. However, the capacity margin of Channel 1 relative to its design discharge is relatively small. These findings indicate that cross-sectional capacity evaluation should be complemented by an assessment of the physical condition and connectivity of the drainage network to provide a more comprehensive explanation of potential inundation.

References

[1] M. W. Strohbach et al., “The ‘hidden urbanization’: Trends of impervious surface in low-density housing developments and resulting impacts on the water balance,” Front. Environ. Sci., vol. 7, no. MAR, pp. 1–10, 2019, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00029.

[2] C. O. Ongaga, M. Makokha, K. Obiero, I. Kipkemoi, and J. Diang’a, “Urbanization and hydrological dynamics: a 22-year assessment of impervious surface changes and runoff in an urban watershed,” Front. Water, vol. 6, no. December, pp. 1–18, 2024, doi: 10.3389/frwa.2024.1455763.

[3] B. Feng, Y. Zhang, and R. Bourke, “Urbanization impacts on flood risks based on urban growth data and coupled flood models,” Nat. Hazards, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 613–627, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11069-020-04480-0.

[4] Ş. Öztürk, K. Yılmaz, A. E. Dinçer, and V. Kalpakcı, “Effect of urbanization on surface runoff and performance of green roofs and permeable pavement for mitigating urban floods,” Nat. Hazards, vol. 120, no. 13, pp. 12375–12399, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11069-024-06688-w.

[5] N. Komang, M. Trisnasari, I. G. Ngurah, H. Respati, and N. K. Armaeni, “Capacity Analysis and Optimization of Urban Drainage Channels Using the SWMM : A Case Study of Jalan Raya Puputan,” vol. 11, no. 01, pp. 11–22, 2026, doi: 10.29244/jsil.11.1.11-22.

[6] Jody Martin Ginting, E. Pardosi, and Sri Anggraeni, “Analysis of the Capacity and Effectiveness of Urban Drainage System,” J. Civ. Eng. Plan., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 280–294, 2025, doi: 10.37253/jcep.v6i2.11693.

[7] X. Hao, J. Mu, and H. Shi, “Experimental study on the inlet discharge capacity under different clogging conditions,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 6, 2021, doi: 10.3390/w13060826.

[8] E. F. Hasyimzoem and A. Zakaria, “Perbandingan Analisis Data Curah Hujan yang Hilang Menggunakan Metode Reciprocal , Normal Ratio , dan Rata-rata Aljabar,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 155–162, 2019.

[9] E. Q. Ajr and F. Dwirani, “DENGAN METODE POLYGON THIESSEN DAERAH KABUPATEN LEBAK,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 139–146, 2019.

[10] M. Iqbal and M. O. Mahendra, “Analisis Drainase Simpang Jalan Dengan Menggunakan Software SWMM 5 . 2 ( Studi Kasus : Jalan Kh . Wasyid Lingkar Selatan , Kota Cilegon ),” vol. 2, pp. 68–79, 2025, doi: 10.33364/konstruksi/v.23-2.2472.

[11] D. Yuniarti, “Analisis Distribusi Frekuensi dan Periode Ulang Hujan ( Studi Kasus : Curah Hujan Kecamatan Long Iram Kabupaten Kutai Barat Tahun 2013-2017 ) Frequency Distribution Analysis and Rain Return Period ( Case Study : Rainfall data of Long Iram Sub-Distric , West Kutai Distric in 2013 to 2017 ),” vol. 11, pp. 65–70, 2020.

[12] R. Suryadi, E. K. Sari, and T. I. Fadhil, “ANALISA DISTRIBUSI CURAH HUJAN DENGAN UJI KECOCOKAN CHI SQUARE DAN SIMIRNOV KOLMOGOROV DI KABUPATEN OKU,” vol. 10, pp. 40–50, 2025.

[13] I. B. Suryatmaja, A. Agung, and R. Ritaka, “Peguyangan Kangin Denpasar Utara,” vol. 3, no. 2, 2023.

[14] A. N. Jifa et al., “Evaluasi Saluran Drainase di Jalan Gajayana dan Jalan Sumbersari Kota Malang Evaluation of Drainage Channels at Gajayana Street and Sumbersari Street Malang,” pp. 9–17.

[15] S. D. Perkotaan, “EVALUASI KAPASITAS SALURAN DRAINASE PERKOTAAN”.

[16] S. Penanggulangan, B. Di, K. Batan, F. Teknik, and U. Kadiri, “KABUPATEN KEDIRI,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 91–100, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-13

Citation Check