Marshall and Volumetric Performance Analysis of AC-BC Mixtures with Geopolymer-Based Artificial Aggregates

Authors

  • Yayan Adi Saputro Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi Universitas Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33603/jki.v14i1.11827

Keywords:

Geopolymer artificial aggregate, AC-BC, Marshall characteristics, volumetric properties, asphalt mixture

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of asphalt concrete binder course (AC-BC) mixtures incorporating artificial coarse aggregates at replacement levels of 0%, 50%, and 100% using the Marshall method. The artificial coarse aggregate exhibited a Los Angeles abrasion value of 40% and an absorption of 6.69%, while the natural aggregate showed an abrasion value of 21.34% and an absorption of 5.33%. The 60/70 penetration asphalt binder used in this study had a penetration value of 64.6 dmm, ductility of 120 cm, specific gravity of 1.036, and a softening point of 38.5 °C. Marshall testing was conducted at a designed asphalt content of 5%. The results indicate that all mixtures achieved acceptable stability, flow, voids in mineral aggregate (VMA), and Marshall quotient values. However, all mixtures exhibited high voids in the mix (VIM) and low voids filled with asphalt (VFA), indicating insufficient effective asphalt content. This behavior is mainly attributed to the high absorption capacity of the artificial aggregates and the relatively low softening point of the asphalt binder. The mixture is not yet volumetrically feasible at 5% asphalt content, so it requires optimization of asphalt content or pre-treatment of artificial aggregates. The findings suggest that artificial aggregates may be utilized in AC-BC mixtures with appropriate adjustments to asphalt content and material properties.

References

[1] Shtayat A, Moridpour S, Best B, Shroff A, Raol D. A review of monitoring systems of pavement condition in paved and unpaved roads. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) 2020;7:629–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2020.03.004.

[2] Budiyanto A, Muhammadun H, Marleno R. Technical Analysis Of Rigid Pavement And Flexible Pavement Calculations On Teuku Umar Road – Rajawali Road 2024;3:432–43.

[3] Karakouzian M, Crow M, Vlerin W, Whitton P, Karami M. An Innovative Design of Railroad Crossties. Designs (Basel) 2025;9:127. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs9060127.

[4] Qian Z, Ren H, Wei Y. Effect of Aggregate Gradation and Morphology on Porous Asphalt Mixture Performance. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 2021;33:4021055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003655.

[5] Kurzekar AS, Waghe U, Ansari K, Dabhade AN, Biswas T, Algburi S, et al. Development and optimization of geopolymer-based artificial angular coarse aggregate using cut-blade mechanism. Case Studies in Construction Materials 2024;21:e03826. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03826.

[6] Hu K, Zhao G, Lv Y, Li J, Zhang J, Qiao P, et al. Mechanistic and environmental benefits of accelerated carbonation in low-cement recycled concrete powder aggregates for sustainable asphalt pavements. Constr Build Mater 2025;493:143117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.143117.

[7] Taghipoor M. Laboratory evaluation of treated recycled concrete aggregate in asphalt mixtures. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology 2019;12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-019-0004-5.

[8] Zou G, Sun X, Liu X, Zhang J. Influence factors on using recycled concrete aggregate in foamed asphalt mixtures based on tensile strength and moisture resistance. Constr Build Mater 2020;265:120363. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120363.

[9] Winardi A, Made ID, Karyawan A, Anshari B. Performance of Artificial Compared to Natural Coarse Aggregates as Road Pavement Materials 2022;8:1841–6. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.2129.

[10] Ago C, Li G, Wu J, Md Yusoff NI. Feasibility Study of Using Hydrophobic Geopolymer-Based as Aggregate Substitution in Asphalt Mixture. Polymers (Basel) 2023;15. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15143077.

[11] Kalinowska-Wichrowska K, Pawluczuk E, Bołtryk M, Nietupski A. Geopolymer Concrete with Lightweight Artificial Aggregates. Materials (Basel) 2022;15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093012.

[12] Pacheco-Torgal F, Ding Y, Miraldo S, Abdollahnejad Z, Labrincha JA. Are geopolymers more suitable than Portland cement to produce high volume recycled aggregates HPC? Constr Build Mater 2012;36:1048–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.004.

[13] Abdollahnejad Z, Pacheco-Torgal F, Aguiar JL, Jesus C. Durability Performance of Fly Ash Based One-Part Geopolymer Mortars. Key Eng Mater 2014;634:113–20. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.634.113.

[14] Singh B, Rahman MR, Paswan R, Bhattacharyya SK. Effect of activator concentration on the strength, ITZ and drying shrinkage of fly ash/slag geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 2016;118:171–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.008.

[15] Murali G. Recent research in mechanical properties of geopolymer-based ultra-high-performance concrete: A review. Defence Technology 2024;32:67–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2023.07.003.

[16] Sarir M, Khan R, Alam M, Khan T, Imran W. Performance Evaluation of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures Using Bagasse Ash as Filler. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology - Transactions of Civil Engineering 2021.

[17] Karyawan ID, Ahyudanari E, Ekaputri J. Potential Use of Fly Ash Base-Geopolymer as Aggregate Substitution in Asphalt Concrete Mixtures. Int J Eng Technol 2017;9:3744–52. https://doi.org/10.21817/ijet/2017/v9i5/170905005.

[18] Sarir M, Khan R, Alam M, Khan T, Imran W. Performance Evaluation of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures Using Bagasse Ash as Filler. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology - Transactions of Civil Engineering 2021.

[19] Karyawan ID, Ahyudanari E, Ekaputri J. Potential Use of Fly Ash Base-Geopolymer as Aggregate Substitution in Asphalt Concrete Mixtures. Int J Eng Technol 2017;9:3744–52. https://doi.org/10.21817/ijet/2017/v9i5/170905005.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-11

Citation Check