Efektivitas Gaya Mencatat Linear dan Non-Linear Bersetting Saintifik dalam Pembelajaran Matematika

Authors

  • Nurul Iman Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v2i2.981

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan keefektifan penerapan gaya mencatat linear dan gaya mencatat non linear dengan setting saintifik ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, komunikasi matematis, dan self-efficacy siswa. Jenis penelitian adalah penelitian quasi eksperimen dengan desain pretets–posttest nonequivalent comparison-group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 15 Yogyakarta. Sampelnya yaitu kelas VIIIE dan VIIIB sebagai kelas eksperimen. Kelas VIIIE diberi perlakuan berupa gaya mencatat linear, sedangkan kelas VIIIB diberi perlakuan berupa gaya mencatat non linear. Untuk menguji keefektifan pembelajaran menggunakan uji paired sample t test. Untuk menguji perbedaan keefektifan menggunakan uji MANOVA (multivariate tests). Untuk uji univariat menggunakan uji independent sample t-test. Adapun hasil penelitian ini adalah: 1) gaya mencatat linear efektif jika ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan komunikasi matematis, sedangkan gaya mencatat non linear efektif jika ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan self-efficacy siswa. 2) Terdapat perbedaan keefektifan antara gaya mencatat linear dan non linear ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, komunikasi matematis dan self-efficacy siswa. 3) gaya mencatat linear lebih efektif jika ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan komunikasi matematis, sedangkan gaya mencatat non linear  lebih efektif jika ditinjasu dari self-efficacy siswa

 

Kata Kunci: linear note taking style, non linear note taking style, prestasi belajar, komunikasi matematis, self-efficacy.

 

References

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy in Changing Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press

Boch, F., & Piolat, A. (2005). Note Taking and Learning: A Summary of Research. The WAC Journal.16(5), 101 – 111

Burns, T., & Sanfield, S. (2004). Teaching, Learning, and Study Skill: A Guide fir Tutors. London: Sage Publication Company

Buzan, T. (2006). The Buzan Study Skills Handbook: The Shortcut to Succes In Your Studies with Mind maps, Speed Reading, and Winning Memory Techniques. English: BBC Lifestyle

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Method in Education. London: Routledge

Greany, T., & Rood, J. (2003). Creating a Learning to Learn School. Stafford: Network Educational Press

Johnson, B. & Christenen, L. (2012). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches (4thed). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication Inc.

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013) Salinan Lampiran Permendikbud no 65 Tahun 2013. Kemendikbud

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013) Salinan Lampiran Permendikbud no 81a Tahun 2013. Kemendikbud

Kiewra, K.A. (2002). How Classroom Teachers Can Help Students Learn and Teach Them How to Learn. Theory into Practice collaborating with JSTOR, 41(2), 71 – 80.

Kaivola, T., & Lokki, H. (2010). Using Concept Mapping As A Note Taking Tool In Computer Science. Helsinski: University Of Helsinki

Liu, X & Koirala, H. (2009). The Effect of Mathematics Self-Efficacy on Mathematics Achievement of High School Students. Paper North east Educational research Association Annual Confrence 22 Oktober 2009

Maddux, J.E. (1995). Self-efficacy, Adaptation and Adjusment. New York: Plenum Press

Mahmudi, A. (2009). Komunikasi dalam pembelajaran matematika. Journal MIPA UNHALU. 8 (1), 1-10.

Makany, T., Kemp, J. & Dror, I. E. (2009). Optimising the use of note-taking as an external cognitive aid for increasing learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 619-635

Marsigit. (Oktober 2015). Pendekatan Saintifik Dan Implementasinya Dalam Kurikulum 2013. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Workshop Implementasi Pendekatan Saintifik dan Pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013 di ruang rapat lantai 2 LPPMP UNY.

Taat, M.S., & De Rozario, G. (2014). The influence Of Academic Attitude and Self-efficacyTowards Students Achievement In Private Higher Learning Institution Malaysia. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 3 (6), 41– 50.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and standar for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Theachers of Mathematics, Inc.

Nitko, A.J., & Brookhart, S.M. (2011). Educational Assesment of Students. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Pajares, F., & Miller, D.M. (1997). Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematical Problem solving: implications of using different form assessment. The Journal of Experimental Education, 65 (3), 213 – 228.

Pajares, F & Urdan, T. (2002). Academic Motivation of Adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

Pauk, W., & Owens, R.J. (2011). How To Study In College Tenth Edition. Ottawa: Wadsworth Cengange Learning ltd.

Santrock, J.W. (2011). Educational psychology (5thed). New York, NY: McGraw Hill Companies.

Schneider, E., & Peschek, W. (2002). Computer algebra systems (cas) and mathematical communication. The International Journal of Computer. 9(3), 231-238.

Ahmad, S., & Husain, A. (2012). Relationship Of Academic SE to Self Regulated Learning, SI, test Anxiety and Academic Achivements. International Journal Of Education. 4 (1), 12 – 25.

Stiggins, R. & Chappuis, J. (2012). An Introduction to Student-Involved Assesment for Learning (6thed). Boston, MA: Perason Education.

Tsai-Fu. (2009). EFL College Freshman Note-Taking Training for Reading Comprehension. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning. 5(2), 12-16.

Untayana, J., & Harta, I. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran limit berbasis pendekatan saintifik berorientasi prestasi belajar dan kemampuan komunikasi matematika. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 45-54. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v3i1.9683

Zimmerman, B.J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners Beyond Achievement to Self-efficacy. Washington DC.

Published

2018-10-30

Citation Check