Adaptasi Test of Mathematical Ability (TOMA-3)

Nani Restati Siregar, Supra Wimbarti, Sri Kusrohmaniah, Yulius Sunardi

Sari


Abstrak. Adaptasi tes kemampuan matematika untuk penelitian secara luas yang melibatkan berbagai lintas usia dan jenjang tingkat pendidikan formal belum banyak dilakukan. Tujuan penelitian ini agar menghasilkan tes test of mathematical ability (TOMA-3) versi Indonesia. Penelitian menggunakan metode survey dengan yang melibatkan penilaian ahli kepada 6 dosen dan 12 guru. Adapun proses adaptasi  meliputi: penerjemahan bahasa, penilaian ahli terhadap konten sub tes soal cerita, uji keterbacaan oleh siswa sekolah dasar dan uji coba untuk memperoleh koefisien reliabilitas. Uji coba tes hasil adaptasi dilakukan kepada siswa sekolah dasar berjumlah 84 orang siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukan beberapa istilah dalam butir soal cerita perlu disesuaikan dengan kondisi anak-anak di Indonesia. Adapun indeks validitas konten sebesar 0,85 dan koefisien reliabilitas menggunakan alpha Cronbach sebesar 0,758. Koefisien reliabilitas tes asli sebesar 0,87 dengan menggunakan jumlah subyek yang lebih banyak pada rentang usia dan pendidikan subjek bervariasi. Sehingga TOMA-3 versi Indonesia dapat direkomendasikan sebagai tes terstandar  baik digunakan secara individual maupun kolektif.

Kata Kunci: Tes Kemampuan Matematika, Penilaian Ahli, Indeks Validitas Konten, Reliabilitas.


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Azwar, S. (2016). Konstruksi Tes Kemampuan Kognitif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bae, Y. S., Chiang, H. M., & Hickson, L. (2015). Mathematical Word Problem Solving Ability of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Their Typically Developing Peers. J Autism Dev Disord. 45(7), 2200-2208.

Berkowitz, M., & Stern, E. (2018). Which Cognitive Abilities Make the Difference? Predicting Academic Achievements in Advanced STEM Studies. Journal of Intelligence 6(4), 48-58.

Bjork, I., & Bowyer-Crane, C. (2013). Cognitive Skills Used to Solve Mathematical Word Problems and Numerical Operations: A Study of 6- to 7-year-old Children. European Journal of Psychology of Education 28(4), 1345-1360.

Brown, V. L., Cronin, M. E., & Bryant, D. P. (2013). Test of Mathematical Ability (TOMA-3) Examiner Manual 3rd ed. Texas: Pro-ed an Publisher.

Chia, N. K. H. (2014). A Comparison of Cognitive Equations of Mathematics Learning Process Between the American and Singaporean Students With Dyscalculia. Educational Research International, 3(1), 1-14.

Ercikan, K., & Lyons-Thomas, J. (2013). Adapting Tests for Use in Other Languages And Cultures. In K. F. Geisinger, B. A. Bracken, J. F. Carlson,

J.-I. C. Hansen, N. R. Kuncel, S. P. Reise, & M. C. Rodriguez (Eds.). APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology. Testing and assessment in school psychology and education (pp. 545–569). American Psychological Association.

Fung, W. & Swanson, H.L. (2017). Working Memory Components that Predict Word Problem Solving: Is It Merely a Function of Reading, Calculation, and Fluid Intelligence? Memory & Cognition 45 (5), 804-823.

Geary D. C. (2011). Consequences, Characteristics, and Causes of Mathematical Learning Disabilities and Persistent Low Achievement in Mathematics. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics: JDBP 32(3), 250–263.

Griffin, H. C. (2019). Review of the Test of Mathematical Abilities–2 (TOMA-2). Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 29(4), 242-244.

Hsiao, H., Lin, C., Chen, J., & Peng, Y. (2018). The Influence of a Mathematics Problem-Solving Training System on First-Year Middle School Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14(1), 77-93.

Johnson, E. S., & Clohessy, A. B. (2014). Identification and Evaluation of Learning Disabilities. The School Team’s Guide to Students Succes. California: Corwin.

Kyllonen, P. C., & Kell, H. (2018). Ability Tests Measure Personality, Personality Tests Measure Ability: Disentangling Construct and Method in Evaluating the Relationship between Personality and Ability. Journal of Intelligence 6(3), 32-42.

Nesayan, A., Amani, M., & Gandomani, R. A. (2019). Cognitive Profile of Children and its Relationship with Academic Performance. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience 10(2), 165–174.

Niam, M. M. (2016). Pengaruh Strategi Metakognitif terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika dan Perubahan Gelombang Otak. Tesis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Nizoloman, A. N. (2013). Relationship between Mathematical Ability and Achievement in Mathematics among Female Secondary School Students in Bayelsa State Nigeri. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 106, 2230-2240.

Nuerk, H.-C., Moeller, K., & Willmes, K. (2015). Multi-Digit Number Processing: Overview, Conceptual Clarifications, and Language Influences. In R. C. Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.). Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of numerical cognition (p.106–139). Oxford: University Press.

Phillipson, S., & Phillipson, S. N. (2012). Children’s Cognitive Ability and Their Academic Achievement: The Mediation Effects of Parental Expectations. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 13, 495–508.

Roy, S. & Roth, D. (2016). Solving General Arithmetic Word Problems. Proceedings of Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 1743-1752.

Sevecke, J. R. (2014). Test Review: Test of Mathematical Abilities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assesment 32(6), 581-584.

Siegler, R. S., Duncan, G. J., Davis-Kean, P. E., Duckworth, K., Claessen, A., Engel, M. ..& Chen, M. (2012). Early Predictors of High School Mathematics Achievement. Psychological Science 23(7), 691-697.

Siregar, N. R., Ilham, M., & Mansyur, M. (2020). The Influence of Survey, Question, Read, Recite, Review Method Toward Reading Comprehension Ability Mediated by Working Memory. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia 9(1), 85-94.

Siregar, N. R., Wimbarti, S., & Ilham, M. (2019). Individual Differences in Attitudes Toward Mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1188(1), 1-10.

Stewart, A. L., Thrasher, A. D., Goldberg, J., & Shen, J. (2012). A Framework for Understanding Modifications to Measure for Diverse Populations. J Aging Health 24(6), 992-1017.

Swanson, H. L., Lussier, C. M., & Orosco, M. J. (2015). Cognitive Strategies, Working Memory, and Growth in Word Problem Solving in Children with Math Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities 48(4), 339-358.

Swanson, H. L., Moran, A., Lussier, C. B., & Fung, W. (2014). The Effect of Explicit and Direct Generative Strategy Training and Working Memory on Word Problem-Solving Accuracy in Children at Risk for Math Difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly 37(2),111-123.

Swanson, H. L., Lussier, C., & Orosco, M. (2013). Effect of Cognitive Strategy Intervention and Cognitive Moderators on Word Problem Solving in Children at Risk for Problem Solving Difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 28(4), 170-183.

Swanson, H. L., Moran., A. S., Bocian., K., Lussier, C., & Zheng, X. (2012) Generative Strategies, Working Memory and Word Problem Solving Accuracy in Children at Risk for Math Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly 36(4), 202-214.

Ursachi, G., Horodnic, I. A., & Zait, A. (2015). How Reliable Measurement Scales? External Factors with Indirect Influence on Reliability Estimators. Procedia Economics and Finance 20, 679-689.

Yeh, C. Y. C., Cheng, H. N. H., Chen, Z., Liao, C. C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2019). Enhancing Achievement and Interest in Mathematics Learning Through Math-Island. RPTE 14(5), 1-10.

Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., & Nikanfar, A. R. (2015). Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an Instrument for Measuring Patient-Centered Communication. Journal of Caring Sciences 4(2), 165–178.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v4i2.3218

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


##submission.copyrightStatement##

Laman JNPM: http://jnpm.ugj.ac.id

JNPM memiliki p-ISSN 2549-8495 | e-ISSN 2549-4937

JNPM is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 Internasional License.

execute(); ?>