Structural Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Beams After Reinforcement Specification Reduction in The SMK Karya Bhakti Brebes Building

Authors

  • Muhammad Umar Faqieh Civil Engineering Department, Universitas Muhadi Setiabudi, Brebes, Indonesia
  • Wahidin` Wahidin Civil Engineering Department, Universitas Muhadi Setiabudi, Brebes, Indonesia
  • Yulia Feriska Civil Engineering Department, Universitas Muhadi Setiabudi, Brebes, Indonesia
  • Ilma Nur Rizqi Civil Engineering Department, Universitas Muhadi Setiabudi, Brebes, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33603/jgst.v10i2.12659

Keywords:

reinforced concrete beam, specification changes, flexural capacity, shear capacity, torsion, reinforcement detailing, SAP2000, SNI 2847:2019

Abstract

Specification changes in reinforced concrete structural members may occur during construction and can affect the conformity, strength, and serviceability of structural elements. This study evaluates the structural performance of the reinforced concrete beam at Grid E of the SMK Karya Bhakti Brebes building under the as-built reinforcement specifications based on the requirements of SNI 2847:2019. The study employed secondary data obtained from the Detail Engineering Design (DED), field implementation data, and structural analysis using SAP2000. The evaluation focused on the beam’s flexural, shear, torsional, and reinforcement detailing performance by comparing the internal forces obtained from structural analysis with the capacity of the as-built beam section. The results show that the beam experienced specification changes, particularly in the longitudinal reinforcement, while the beam dimensions and concrete strength remained consistent with the design specifications. The as-built beam uses 3D16 longitudinal reinforcement, with an installed reinforcement area of 603.19 mm². The analysis produced a maximum negative bending moment of 32.74 kN·m at the support, while the design flexural capacity was 108.80 kN·m, indicating that the flexural capacity remained adequate. The maximum shear force at the support was 90.12 kN, while the calculated shear capacity ratio reached 3.47, indicating that the nominal shear strength was sufficient. The beam was also subjected to a torsional moment of 0.2029 kN·m, which was evaluated in accordance with SNI 2847:2019 and did not govern the structural capacity assessment. The maximum calculated deflection remained within the allowable limit, indicating acceptable serviceability performance. However, despite the beam satisfying the strength requirements for flexure and shear, the provided stirrup spacing did not comply with the required detailing provisions, with 100 mm spacing at the support exceeding the allowable 63 mm and 150 mm spacing at the span exceeding the allowable 126 mm. Therefore, the as-built beam retains adequate nominal structural capacity, but its transverse reinforcement detailing does not fully comply with SNI 2847:2019. These findings indicate that structural specification changes should be accompanied by comprehensive strength, serviceability, and detailing verification before being accepted as an alternative to the original design.

References

[1] Ubaidillah dan Walujodjati, "Studi Kuat Lentur Balok Beton Bertulang dengan Tulangan Bundel dan Tulangan Tunggal," Jurnal Konstruksi, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 202–213, 2022.

[2] Hamkah, P. L. Frans, dan Z. Saing, "Improving Flexural Moment Capacity of Concrete Beam by Changing the Reinforcement Configuration," International Journal of GEOMATE, vol. 20, no. 79, pp. 161–167, Mar. 2021.

[3] S. Wardi dan S. Y. Ardiansyah, "Perbandingan Ketentuan dan Analisis Detailing Hubungan Balok-Kolom Berdasarkan SNI 2847:2013 dan SNI 2847:2019 (Studi Kasus: Gedung Perkuliahan Lima Tingkat di Kota Padang)," Borneo Engineering: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 159–170, Aug. 2022.

[4] J. Suranto, "Analisis Keruntuhan dari Kolom Beton Bertulang Jacketing Menggunakan Tulangan dan Tanpa Tulangan dengan Variasi Beban Aksial," Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1730–1744, Feb. 2026.

[5] Prabowo dan M. Lutfi, "Analisis Struktur Bangunan Gedung Sekolah akibat Penambahan Ruang Kelas Baru (Studi Kasus di SMK Bina Putera Kota Bogor)," Jurnal Manajemen Aset Infrastruktur & Fasilitas, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 111–122, Apr. 2020.

[6] M. F. Rosyidi, A. Susanto, K. Yudoprasetyo, dan M. A. Alrasyidi, "Evaluasi dan Perkuatan Beton Bertulang Struktur Silo Kerucut," Jurnal Bangunan, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 169–180, Oct. 2025.

[7] Krismayanti, "Pengaruh Rasio Tulangan Longitudinal terhadap Respon Momen-Kurvatur Kolom Beton Bertulang dengan Beban Aksial Rendah," Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 21–28, May 2026.

[8] M. F. Zulfikri, M. G. Khomari, dan S. A. Hardiyanti, "Evaluasi Balok Beton Bertulang dengan Variasi Bentang terhadap Dimensi dan Tulangan," Jurnal Riset Teknik Sipil dan Sains (J-RITEKS), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 75–80, Feb. 2023.

[9] M. A. Fattach dan E. Juliafad, "Pengaruh Penambahan Tulangan Menggunakan Acrylate Epoxy sebagai Bahan Perekat Terhadap Gaya Lentur Balok Beton Bertulang," SITek: Jurnal Sains, Informatika, dan Teknologi, Feb. 2026.

[10] J. L. P. Tamayo dan G. O. Garcia, "Reassessment of the flexural behavior of high-strength reinforced concrete beams under short-term loads," SN Applied Sciences, vol. 3, no. 204, pp. 1–15, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s42452-021-04190-7.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-18

Citation Check