Analysis of Transportation Mode Choice Preferences of Serang Raya University Students Using The Stated Preference Method

Authors

  • Gita Cahyani Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Serang Raya, Serang, Banten, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Oka Mahendra Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Serang Raya, Serang, Banten, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33603/jgst.v10i2.12522

Keywords:

Transportation mode choice, Stated Preference, Binary logistic regression, Ability to pay (ATP), Willingness to pay (WTP)

Abstract

Transportation mode choice is an important aspect of transportation planning and is influenced by trip characteristics and users' socioeconomic conditions. Students at Serang Raya University have diverse travel characteristics, necessitating an analysis of factors affecting transportation mode choice preferences. This study aims to analyze the influence of travel cost, travel time, comfort, and safety and security attributes on the transportation mode preferences of Serang Raya University students, and to evaluate students' Ability to Pay (ATP) and Willingness to Pay (WTP). The study uses a quantitative method with a Stated Preference approach by distributing questionnaires to 100 respondents. Data were analyzed using validity and reliability tests, binary logistic regression, and ATP and WTP analyses. The results show that all research attributes are valid and reliable with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.842. Binary logistic regression analysis indicates that travel cost and travel time significantly affect transportation mode preferences, with travel cost being the most dominant factor. The students’ average ATP was IDR 1,432,323 per month, while their average WTP was IDR 10,227 per trip. The study also showed that motorcycles were the most commonly used transportation mode by students commuting to campus. These findings are expected to support policy formulation and the development of a more effective and efficient transportation system that meets students' mobility needs.

References

[1] A. Budiman, R. T. Bethary, and F. F. Hilzams, “Analysis of Transportation Mode Choice among Students of the Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa (Cilegon–Tangerang Case Study),” Fondasi: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 11, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.36055/fondasi.v0i0.14502.

[2] Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Banten, Number of Motor Vehicles by Regency/Municipality and Vehicle Type in Banten Province (Units), 2024. Serang, Indonesia: BPS Provinsi Banten, 2024.

[3] O. Oktaviani and M. Pebriani, “Characteristics of Transportation Mode Choice for Travel to Campus (Case Study: Students of the Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang),” CIVED, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 474–483, 2023, doi: 10.24036/cived.v10i2.122945.

[4] P. F. Belgiawan, R. A. Rahadi, A. R. Qastharin, L. Mayangsari, R. A. Nasution, and S. K. Wiryono, “The Commuting Mode Choice of Students of Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia,” Journal of Regional and City Planning, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 150–164, 2021, doi: 10.5614/jpwk.2021.32.2.4.

[5] B. A. Priambodho, S. Asyiah, R. T. Bethary, D. N. Setiawati, and K. Takimai, “Analysis of Transportation Mode Choice among Students of Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa,” Jurnal Komposit: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Teknik Sipil, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 205–214, 2025, doi: 10.32832/komposit.v9i1.16446.

[6] J. Nathanael, D. Linggasari, and H. Angkat, “Analysis of Ability to Pay (ATP) and Willingness to Pay (WTP) of Electric Rail Passengers on the Bogor–Jakarta Kota Route,” JMTS: Jurnal Mitra Teknik Sipil, vol. 4, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.24912/jmts.v4i1.10454.

[7] A. R. Lubis, A. S. Lubis, and M. S. Surbakti, “Analysis of Ability to Pay and Willingness to Pay for Urban Public Transport Tariffs,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 725, no. 1, Art. no. 012097, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/725/1/012097.

[8] A. K. Adani, T. Murtejo, and N. Chayati, “Fare Determination Study for Buy the Service Trans Pakuan Corridor 1 Using the Ability to Pay and Willingness to Pay Methods,” Journal of Applied Civil Engineering and Infrastructure Technology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 07–14, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.52158/jaceit.v5i1.567.

[9] Sugiyono, Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta, 2019.

[10] A. Ilahi, P. F. Belgiawan, M. Balac, and K. W. Axhausen, “Understanding Travel and Mode Choice with Emerging Modes: A Pooled Stated Preference and Revealed Preference Model in Greater Jakarta, Indonesia,” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., vol. 150, pp. 398–422, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.06.023.

[11] G. Pratidina and M. O. Mahendra, “Modeling Commuter Mode Shift to Electric Railway Services: An Integrated Performance Analysis and Stated Preference Approach for the Rangkasbitung–Merak Line,” Journal of Infrastructure Planning and Engineering, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2026, doi: 10.22225/JIPE.5.1.2026.23-32.

[12] A. Argarisma and B. P. Naipospos, “Increasing the Use of Non-Motorized Transport Modes through Stated Preference among Public High School Students in Central Jakarta,” Jurnal Komposit: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Teknik Sipil, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 183–191, 2023, doi: 10.32832/komposit.v7i2.14520.

[13] A. N. Oktaviani and M. O. Mahendra, “Evaluation of Multimodal Transportation Integration Facilities at Serang Station,” Journal of Infrastructure Planning and Engineering, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 72–82, 2025, doi: 10.22225/jipe.4.2.2025.72-82.

[14] L. Hevanda and M. O. Mahendra, “Public Transportation Mode Choice for the Cilegon–Merak Route Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Method,” Jurnal Konstruksi, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 2025, doi: 10.33364/konstruksi/v.23-1.2288.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-18

Citation Check