Teaching Reading through Reciprocal Teaching Strategy

Deni Afrizatama

Abstract


This  is  experimental  research  with  quantitative  approach  to  analyse  the  data.
Quasi  experimental  is  used  to  gain  the  data  by  using  the  matching  only  pretest  –
postest  control  group  design.Tne  main  ptirpose  of  tnis  researcn  was  intended  to  find
out  whether  reciprocal  teaching  strategy  in  teaching  reading  for  the  eighth  grade  at
SMPN 10 Kota Cirebon is effective or not and what the students’ response in learning
reading using reciprocal teaching strategy are. In this research. The population of this
research  was  eighth  grade  students  of  SMPN  10  Kota  Cirebon  in  the  2015/2016
academic year. The number population is about 270 students consisted of nine classes
and each class consisted of 25  – 30 students.  This research only took two classes as
sample,  VIII  H  as  control  class  and  VIII  I  as  experimental  class.  There  were  two
research  instruments  that  was  used  to  gather  the  data:  Test  (Pre-test  and  Post-test)
was used to find out the students’s achievement in reading before and after teaching
reading by using reciprocal teaching strategy and questionnaire was used to find out
the students’ response about learning reading using reciprocal teaching strategy. After
collecting the data, the data was analyzed by using t-test formula from fraenkel to find
out  t-account.  The  result  of  the  test  showed  that  t-account  was  4.47  and  t-table  was
2.012  with  (df)  48  and  significant  level  0.05  (5%).  It  means  that  t-account  (4.47)  is
higher  than  t-table  (2.021).  It  can  be  concluded  that  (Ha)  “Reciprocal  teaching
strategyis  effectivein  teaching  reading  for  the  eighth  grade  at  SMPN  10  Kota
Cirebon.†is accepted.

Keywords


Reading, Teaching Reading, Reciprocal Teaching Stratetegy.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmadi, M. R., &Gilakjani, A.P.(2012).

Theory and Practice in Language

Studies. Reciprocal Teaching

Strategies and Their Impact on

English Reading Comprehension,

(10), 2053-2060.

doi:10.4304/tpls.2.10.

Bouchard, M.

(2005).ComprehensionStrategies

for English Language

Learner.New York, NY:

Scholastic Inc.

Borg, W. R., Gall, J. P., & Gall, M. D.

(2003). Educational Research: An

Introduction 7th ed. New York,

NY: Pearson Education, Inc.

Díaz, S., &Laguado, J. (2013). Action

Research. Journal of Studies in

Education. Improving Reading

Skills through Skimming and

Scanning Techniques at a Public

School.10(1), 134-150.

Doolittle, P. E., Hicks, D., Triplett,C. F.,

Nichols, W. D.,&Young, C. A.

(2006). Theory and Practice in

Language Studies. Reciprocal

Teaching for Reading

Comprehension in Higher

Education: A Strategy for

Fostering the Deeper

Understanding of Texts, 17(2),

-118.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, & Norman, E. H.

(2012). How to design and

evaluation research 8th ed. New

York, NY:

Johnson, A. P. (2008). Teaching reading

and writing:a guidebook for

tutoring and remediating student.

New York, NY:Rowman&

Littlefield Education.

Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., &Bordman,

A. (2007). Teaching reading

comprehension to student swith

learning difficulties. New York,

NY: A Division of Guilford

Publications, Inc.

Lee, A. Westera, J. &Diggins, C. (2003).

Quality Teaching for Diverse

Students in Schooling: Best

Evidence Synthesis. New Zealand:

BES.

McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reading

Comprehension Strategies:

Theories,Interventions, and

Technologies. New York, NY:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.

Oakhill,J.,Cain, K.,&Elbro, C. (2015).

Understanding and teaching

reading comprehension: a

handbook.New York,

NY:Routledge

Oczkus, L.(2013). Reciprocal Teaching.

Powerful Hands-on

Comprehension Strategy,16(1), 34-38.

Salehi, M., &Vafakhah S.

(2013).Australian Journal of Basic

and Applied Sciences. A

Comparative Study of Reciprocal

Teaching Only (RTO) and Explicit

Teaching of Strategies before

Reciprocal Teaching (ET-RT) On

Reading Comprehension of EFL

Learners, 7(2). 148-155.

Sudjana, N. (2009). PenilaianHasil

Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung:

PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

VanderStoep, S. W., & Johnson, D. D.

(2009). Research methods for

everyday life: blending qualitative

and quantitative approaches. San

Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/perspective.v4i2.1541

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
execute(); ?>