LEGAL SYNCHRONIZATION STUDY ON THE ISSUANCE OF DUPLICATE LAND CERTIFICATES AND THEIR LEGAL CONSEQUENCES (A CASE ANALYSIS OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURT DECISION NO. 79/G/2023/PTUN.BDG IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE APPEAL DECISION NO. 8/B/2024/PT.TUN.JKT AND THE JUDICI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v10i1.11276Keywords:
Duplicate certificates, land registration, agrarian law, administrative defectsAbstract
This study examines the legal implications arising from the issuance of duplicate land certificates in Indonesia’s land registration system based on the analysis of decisions delivered by the Administrative Court (PTUN), the Administrative High Court (PT TUN), and the Supreme Court in Judicial Review (PK). The research employs a normative juridical method supported by case analysis and prescriptive interpretation. The findings indicate that the regulatory framework consisting of the Basic Agrarian Law of 1960, Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997, and technical land regulations is normatively coherent. The emergence of duplicate certificates is attributed to administrative verification failures by the National Land Agency rather than regulatory disharmony. The judicial decisions consistently identify substantive administrative defects, resulting in annulment, mandatory revocation, and corrective administrative measures. The voluntary execution undertaken by the National Land Agency is legally classified as execution of the judgment. The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the Judicial Review confirms the finality of the annulment and affirms that only certificates issued through lawful procedures possess legal validity. The study highlights the importance of administrative diligence and judicial oversight.
References
Apeldoorn, L. J. van. (2001). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2015). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.
Hadjon, P. M. (2002). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Harahap, M. Y. (2022). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Harsono, B. (2005). Hukum Agraria Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan.
Indroharto. (1993). Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Buku I). Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.
Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Penafsiran Hukum. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ridwan, H. R. (2016). Hukum Administrasi. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.
Soekanto, S. (1983). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2004). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Sumardjono, M. S. W. (2005). Kebijakan Pertanahan antara Regulasi dan Implementasi. Jakarta: Kompas.
Sumardjono, M. S. W. (2008). Tanah dalam Perspektif Hak Ekonomi, Sosial, dan Budaya. Jakarta: Kompas.
Utrecht. (1989). Pengantar dalam Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Miftahudin, Endang Sutrisno, Sanusi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal HERMENUTIKA, Sekolah Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum. Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Jurnal HERMENEUTIKA, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Jurnal HERMENEUTIKA are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
