EFL students' perception towards audio and written peer feedback experiences in online class
Keywords:
EFL students’ perception, Audio and Written Peer Feedback, Peer Feedback Online, Online ClassAbstract
In this modern era, teachers are aware of the importance of providing quality feedback that can improve the student's learning process (Alessandra et al., 2020). One important part in the learning process is feedback. Peer feedback is one of the feedback that can be applied by the teacher. Moreover, in an online class, peer feedback is one way of making the learning process more effective. This study aims to determine students' perceptions of the use of written and audio peer feedback in online classes. When implementing feedback in an online classroom, students act as both givers and receivers of feedback. This research was conducted using a qualitative case study method. Data was taken by distributing questionnaires and deeper data was taken by conducting interview sessions. The results found that the students had a positive perception of the use written and audio feedback in online classes. In addition, students also benefited greatly from the use of this written and audio feedback.
References
Alessandra, S., D. Dirhan and P. Davidson (2020) An overview of audio and written feedback from students’ and instructors’ perspective, Educational Media International, DOI: 10.1080/09523987.2020.1744853
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Diab, N. (2011). Assessing the relationship between different types of student feedback and the quality of revised writing. Assessing Writing, 16(4), 274– 292.
Farshi, S., & Safa, S. (2015). The effect of two types of corrective feedback on EFL learners’ writing skill. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1), 26–30.
Hu, G. (2005). Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 321–342
Kim, S. 2010. Revising the Revision Process with Google Docs. In TESOL Classroom Practice Series, edited by S. Kasten S 171-178 (Effective Second Language Writing Chapter 18). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology a step-by-step guide for beginners 3rd edition. SAGE.
Lili, T., & L. Li (2019): Chinese EFL learners’ perception of peer oral and written feedback as providers, receivers and observers, Language Awareness, DOI: 10.1080/09658416.2018.1535602
Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic Epistemology. Columbia, OH: Columbia University Press.
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sin Wang Chong (2019): College students’ perception of e-feedback: a grounded theory perspective, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1572067
Tocalli-Beller, A., & Swain, M. (2005). Reformulation and the cognitive conflict it generates. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 5–28.
Vidmar, D. J. 2005. Reflective peer coaching: Crafting collaborative self- assessment in teaching. Research Strategies 20(3): 135–48.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.
Ying, G., Christian Dieter D. Schunn and Q. Yu (2018): The alignment of written peer feedback with draft problems and its impact on revision in peer assessment, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1499075
Yu-Fen Yang (2015): Transforming and constructing academic knowledge through online peer feedback in summary writing, Computer Assisted Language Learning, DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2015.1016440
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ainun Fahreza, Ratna Andhika Mahaputri, Linda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Upon receiving the proofs, the Author/Editor agrees to promptly check the proofs carefully, correct any errors, and authorize the publication of the corrected proofs.
