Students’ perception on studying TOEFL using Yanto Tanjung’s YouTube channel
Keywords:
Students’ perception, TOEFL, Structure and Written Expression, YouTube, Yanto Tanjung.Abstract
This study aims to explore the perceptions of English students regarding their learning of the structure and written expression sections of the TOEFL test through Yanto Tanjung’s YouTube channel. This study employed a descriptive qualitative design, involving four participants selected through purposive sampling, and the data were collected using semi-structured interviews, which were then analyzed thematically. The findings revealed that students held a positive perception of Yanto Tanjung’s YouTube channel as a supplementary learning resource. The channel was perceived as beneficial in enhancing their understanding of complex grammar structures, improving test readiness, and fostering learning motivation. Participants appreciated the flexibility of self-paced learning, the clarity of explanations, and the relevance of examples provided in the videos. Furthermore, YouTube was regarded as an effective and accessible alternative for students who were unable to join formal TOEFL preparation courses. However, some challenges were also identified, including technical issues and limited access to exclusive content. In conclusion, Yanto Tanjung’s YouTube channel serves as a valuable support in TOEFL preparation, particularly in mastering structure and written expression, and highlights the potential of digital platforms to enhance students’ learning experiences and complement conventional instruction in the digital era.
References
References
Abboud, Z. A., Nur, H., & Rahman, F. (2011). Types of TOEFL tests and their impact on learners. Journal of Language Testing, 18(2), 45–59.
Alhamami, M. (2013). Observation of YouTube language learning videos (YouTube LLVs). Teaching English with Technology, 13(3), 3–17.
Almurashi, W. A. (2016). The effective use of YouTube videos for teaching English language in classrooms as supplementary material at Taibah University in Alula. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 4(3), 32–47.
Bastos, A. M., & Ramos, J. (2009). Using YouTube as a tool for learning English. Journal of Digital Education, 5(2), 45–56.
Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2010). New literacies and autonomy in foreign language learning. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (Eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching with technology (pp. 63–80). Bloomsbury.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Pearson Longman.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Educational Testing Service. (1964). TOEFL test and score manual. Pricenton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.
Gear, R., & Gear, R. (2006). Cambridge preparation for the TOEFL test (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Second language writing online: An update. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 1-15.
Hafner, C. A., & Miller, L. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy in English for science: A YouTube project in a Hong Kong university. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 68–86.
Hafner, C. A., Chik, A., & Jones, R. H. (2015). Digital literacies and language learning. Palgrave Macmillan.
James, P. (2017). Online learning: Advantages and disadvantages. Educational Technology Review, 25(4), 77–89.
Jimmi, S., Rahmawati, A., & Lestari, D. (2023). Student perceptions of TOEFL during online learning in the pandemic era. Journal of English Education Research, 12(2), 145–158.
Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies: YouTube and language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(1), 10–16.
Kelsen, B. (2009). Teaching EFL through YouTube: A classroom application. The Reading Matrix, 9(1), 100–110.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
Kunnan, A. J. (2008). Test fairness and TOEFL. Routledge.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage.
Latifah, N., & Prastowo, A. (2020). The role of YouTube as an online learning media in developing students’ creativity. Journal of Education and Learning, 14(3), 321–329.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Melinda, R. (2024). Exploring students' perception in learning structure & written expression in TOEFL through YouTube channels in English literature students of Pamulang University. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 11(1), 55–68.
Michael, P. (2002). Longman complete course for the TOEFL test: Preparation for the computer and paper test. Longman.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
Nadara, F. (2024). Exploring the effectiveness of Yanto Tanjung’s YouTube channel as a TOEFL preparation resource for Indonesian university students. Journal of Language and Digital Learning, 9(2), 110–125.
Phillips, D. (2001). Longman complete course for the TOEFL test. Pearson Education.
Phillips, D. (2004). Longman preparation course for the TOEFL test: The paper test (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Rahayu, N. (2020). The influence of YouTube as learning media toward students’ speaking skills. Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(2), 150–159.
Richards, J. C. (2015). Key issues in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Rixza, S. (2025). The role of YouTube channels in TOEFL preparation: A case study of Yanto Tanjung’s channel. Journal of English Education Research, 13(1), 88–101.
Sari, R. P., & Yuliani, N. (2023). The effectiveness of YouTube videos on grammar mastery in TOEFL preparation. Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4), 250–259.
Sharpe, P. J. (2013). Barron’s TOEFL iBT with audio CDs (14th ed.). Barron’s Educational Series.
Sharpe, P. J. (2017). Barron’s TOEFL iBT (16th ed.). Barron’s Educational Series.
Sharpe, P. J. (2020). Barron’s TOEFL iBT with online tests (17th ed.). Barron’s Educational Series.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
Suriyah, F. (2022). Student perceptions of TOEFL structure and written expression learning using YouTube and Instagram videos. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(4), 655–662.
Tanjung, Y. (2013). https://www.youtube.com/@Yantotanjung
Veletsianos, G. (2010). A definition of emerging technologies for education. Educational Technology, 52(4), 47–54.
Watkins, J., & Wilkins, M. (2011). Using YouTube in the EFL classroom. Language Education in Asia, 2(1), 113–119.
Weng, F., Yang, R.-J., Ho, H.-J., & Su, J.-H. (2020). A TAM-based study of the attitude towards the use of YouTube in learning. Sustainability, 12(19), 7917. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197917
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hustarna, Lausa Sila Aprilia, Nunung Fajaryani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Upon receiving the proofs, the Author/Editor agrees to promptly check the proofs carefully, correct any errors, and authorize the publication of the corrected proofs.
