SOUND GRAMMAR, FLAWED REASONING: RHETORICAL FALLACIES IN ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING OF ENGLISH EDUCATION THESES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33603/perspective.v13i1.10212Keywords:
Rhetorical structure, Logical fallacy, Argumentative writing, Students’ thesesAbstract
This study investigated the prevalence and types of rhetorical fallacies in the argumentative sections of English education theses, despite overall grammatical accuracy. Drawing on Toulmin’s argument model, cognitive reasoning theories, and nexus-juncture analysis, three-fifty undergraduate theses from three universities in Indonesia were analyzed qualitatively. Common fallacies such as hasty generalization, false cause, strawman, circular reasoning, and either/or reasoning were identified and mapped onto Toulmin’s components (claims, warrants, backing, rebuttals). Findings revealed that students demonstrated competency in grammatical structures but often lacked logical consistency in their arguments which led to flawed reasoning that undermined their thesis statements. The findings recommended that integrating rhetorical fallacy identification into writing instruction could improve both the clarity and validity of student arguments. This study highlighted the need for focused pedagogical strategies to address both grammar and reasoning skills in argumentative writing to promote effective and persuasive academic communication in English education.
References
Abidin, I. H. Z., Abd Patah, M. O. R., Majid, M. A. A., Usman, S. B., & Zulkornain, L. H. (2024). A practical guide to improve trustworthiness of qualitative research for novices. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 6(S1), 8–15.
Alatas, M. A., Ahmadi, A., & Yohanes, B. (2025). Critical reasoning of students in learning: Paragraph analysis of response texts using the Toulmin model. Ghuru: International Journal of Teacher Education, 1(2), 80–91.
Anindita, P. (2024). Cohesion and coherence problems among non-native English students’ writing essays. Journal of Lensa: Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 14(1), 58–79.
Asbar, A., Mahmud, M., & Halim, A. (2025). Unpacking genre-based instruction: Cognitive, emotional, and behavioral engagement in high school writing. Seltics Journal: Scope of English Language Teaching Literature and Linguistics, 8(1), 1–15.
Badjeber, R., Supriyatman, S., Afadil, A., & Hadi, W. (2024). A review of Toulmin's argumentation in mathematics and science learning: Implementation, impact and the role of the teacher. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 25(3), 1199–1213.
Bengtsson, M., & Schousboe, S. (2024). And that’s a fact: A rhetorical perspective on the role of fact-checkers. Journalism Practice, 18(9), 2414–2432.
Daeng, L., & Enre, F. (2024). Enhancing argumentative essay writing skills in junior high school students through mind mapping. International Journal of Curriculum Development, Teaching and Learning Innovation, 2(2), 61–68.
Dahl, E., & Grieco, B. (2024). Complex verb constructions in Indo-Aryan in synchrony and diachrony: An introduction. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, 11(1–2), 1–5.
Diep, G. L., & Le, T. N. D. (2024). An analysis of coherence and cohesion in English majors’ academic essays. International Journal of Language Instruction, 3(3), 1–21.
Gulen, S., & Donmez, I. (2024). Valuating the effect of Toulmin argumentation model on critical thinking and epistemological beliefs in online education. Journal of Educational Sciences, 25, 140–158.
Ha, T. T. X. (2024). The interconnection between systemic functional language and the grammar of visual design in the context of advertising language. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 1–10.
Hong, S. J., & Kim, Y. (2024). How do gain-loss frames and cultural arguments persuade? Designing effective messages to weaken college students’ binge-drinking intentions. Journal of Health Communication, 29(4), 233–243.
Iftikhar, A., Khalil, M., & Asghar, I. (2025). Hedging and emphasis: The use of discourse markers in undergraduate research writing. Indus Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 683–692.
Kinnear, B., Martini, A., Varpio, L., Driessen, E. W., & Schumacher, D. J. (2024). How do validity experts conceptualise argumentation? It's a rhetorical question. Medical Education, 58(8), 989–997.
Li, Y. (2024). Error analysis of college English writing based on the cohesion and coherence theory. International Journal of English Linguistics, 14(2), 73–81.
Lindahl, A., & Borin, L. (2024). Annotation for computational argumentation analysis: Issues and perspectives. Language and Linguistics Compass, 18(1), e12505.
Lu, X. (2025). Meaning and function dimensions of linguistic complexity in second language writing. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 100191.
Mallahi, O. (2024). Critical thinking skills, academic resilience, grit and argumentative writing performance of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 11(2), 100–130.
Mallahi, O. (2024). Exploring the status of argumentative essay writing strategies and problems of Iranian EFL learners. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(1), 19.
Marnita, R., & Zulprianto, Z. (2024). Exploring Lecturers’ Proficiency in Argumentative Writing: Rhetorical Strategies, Coherence, and Linguistic Challenges. AJARCDE: Asian Journal of Applied Research for Community Development and Empowerment, 8(2), 281-286.
Misbah, R. (2024). Political sophistry and logical fallacies in the discourse on Israeli occupation: An analysis of Caryl Churchill’s Seven Jewish Children (2009). Delta University Scientific Journal, 7(2), 246–256.
Nippold, M. A. (2024). Unlocking logical fallacies: A key to building critical thinking skills in adolescents. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 9(1), 1–13.
Scott, B. D. (2024). The rhetorical methodology of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s theory of argumentation. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 57(1), 1–29.
Song, Z., Qi, F., & Yong, M. F. (2024). Rhetorical features of argument and counterargument structures in Chinese EFL learners’ argumentative writing. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 21(4), 818–838.
Sriwanat, S., & Phoocharoensil, S. (2024). A comparison of rhetorical move structure of research article abstracts of Thai Scopus journals and top-ranked Scopus journals in applied linguistics and English language teaching. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 12(3), 11–17.
Stevani, M. (2024). Connecting world lexicons: Figurative language’s role in BBC News listening for intercultural competence. LETS: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching Studies, 5(2), 118–129.
Stevani, M. (2024). Unlocking meaning: Truth-conditional semantic and syntactic analysis in the Bible. Kurious Journal, 10(2), 372–386. https://doi.org/10.30995/kur.v10i2.925
Stevani, M., Yanti, N., Hidayat, I. M., Laia, F. D., & Halawa, A. I. (2024). Developing interactive multimedia-based ESP to improve English proficiency and career guidance at UPMI Medan. English Review: Journal of English Education, 12(3), 893–896.
Suratno, A., & Aydawati, E. N. (2025). Hedging strategies in non-science theses: A corpus-based analysis of discussion sections. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 16(1), 37–52.
Wambsganss, T., Janson, A., Söllner, M., Koedinger, K., & Leimeister, J. M. (2025). Improving students’ argumentation skills using dynamic machine-learning–based modeling. Information Systems Research, 36(1), 474–507.
Yulandari, E. S., & Alfarisi, S. (2025). Intertextuality in academic writing: Teaching students to weave stronger arguments. Journal of Advance in Language, Literature, and Education, 1(1), 1–6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Margaret Stevani, Alexander Adrian Saragi, Happy Kusuma Wardani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 Internasional License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the works' authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Upon receiving the proofs, the Author/Editor agrees to promptly check the proofs carefully, correct any errors, and authorize the publication of the corrected proofs.
- Authors should submit the signed copyright transfer agreement form (CTA Form) along with the checked (and corrected proofs).
