Peran perilaku kerja inovatif dan keterlibatan kerja dosen vokasi di Jawa Timur

Nilawati Fiernaningsih, Pudji Herijanto, Anna Widayani


Abstract. Lecturers are one of the resources that play a very important role in achieving higher education goals. Performance from lecturers is essential for organizational development and for the success of higher education. A vocational public university in the province of East Java is the subject of this study, which intends to investigate the effects of innovative behavior and workplace involvement on the effectiveness of teaching staff. The sample in this study was 316 people taken by proportional random sampling method. SEM-PLS data analysis is the quantitative methodology used in this investigation. According to the study's findings, work engagement significantly influences innovative work behavior. Additionally, innovative work behavior conduct has a big impact on how well employees succeed. Finally, employee performance is significantly impacted by work engagement.


Keywords:  Innovative work behavior; Work engagement; Employee Performance.


Abstrak. Dosen merupakan salah satu sumber daya yang memegang peranan sangat berarti dalam mencapai tujuan perguruan tinggi. Dalam pengembangan organisasi, kinerja dosen sangat diperlukan buat keberhasilan pendidikan tinggi. Studi ini bertujuan buat mengkaji peran perilaku inovatif serta keterlibatan kerja terhadap kinerja staf dosen di suatu perguruan tinggi negeri vokasi di provinsi Jawa Timur. Sampel dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 316 orang diambil dengan metode proportional random sampling. Riset ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan analisis informasi SEM- PLS. Hasil pada penelitian ini menampilkan bahwa work engagement mempengaruhi signifikan terhadap perilaku inovatif kerja. Selain itu, perilaku kerja inovatif memiliki dampak yang signifikan terhadap kinerja karyawan. Terakhir, keterlibatan kerja memiliki dampak yang signifikan terhadap kinerja karyawan.


Katakunci:  Perilaku Kerja Inovatif; Keterlibatan Kerja; Kinerja Karyawan.



Innovative work behavior; Work engagement; Employee Performance

Full Text:



Abid, G., Zahra, I., & Ahmed, A. (2016). Promoting thriving at work and waning turnover intention: A relational perspective. Future Business Journal, 2(2), 127–137.

Afsar, B., Al-Ghazali, B. M., Cheema, S., & Javed, F. (2020). Cultural intelligence and innovative work behavior: the role of work engagement and interpersonal trust. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(4), 1082–1109.

Agarwal, U. A., Datta, S., Blake-Beard, S., & Bhargava, S. (2012). Linking LMX, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work engagement. Career Development International, 17(3), 208–230.

Andayani, D., Kabalmay, S., Resandi, R., & Darmawan, D. (2010). Pemberdayaan Karyawan Berbasis Keunggulan Bersaing. Inti Presindo Pustaka, Bandung.

Bernardin, H.J. and Russell, J. E. (1993). Human Resource Management: An Experiential Approach. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Buil, I., Martínez, E., & Matute, J. (2019). Transformational leadership and employee performance: The role of identification, engagement and proactive personality. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77(June 2018), 64–75.

Carmeli, A., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: implications for innovative behaviors at work. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(3), 169–191.

Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: a quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual p. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89–136.

Chughtai, A. A. (2008). Impact of Job Involvement on In-Role Job Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour. 192.

Demircioglu, M. A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2017). Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Research Policy, 46(9), 1681–1691.

Dhar, S. G. R. (2017). Employee Service Innovative Behavior : The Roles of Leader-Member Exchange ( LMX ), Work. Lmx.

Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367–1377.

Gorgievski, M. J., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Passion for work: Work engagement versus workaholism. Handbook of Employee Engagement: Perspectives, Issues, Research and Practice, 264–271.

Groselj Matej, Matej Cerne, S. P. and B. G. (2020). Authentic and transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour : the moderating role of psychological empowerment. European Journal of Innovation Management.

Høyrup, S. (2012). Employee-driven innovation: A new phenomenon, concept and mode of innovation.

Huhtala, H., & Parzefall, M. R. (2007). A review of employee well-being and innovativeness: An opportunity for a mutual benefit. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(3), 299–306.

Isen, A. M. (2001). An Influence of Positive Affect on Decision Making in Complex Situations: Theoretical Issues with Practical Implications. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(2), 75–85.

Janssen, O. (2000a). Job demands , perceptions of e V ort – reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. 287–302.

Janssen, O. (2000b). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287–302.

Kim, C., Zhao, W., & Yang, K. H. (2008). An empirical study on the integrated framework of e-CRM in online shopping: Evaluating the relationships among perceived value, satisfaction, and trust based on customers’ perspectives. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 6(3), 1–19.

Li, M., Liu, Y., Liu, L., & Wang, Z. (2017). Proactive Personality and Innovative Work Behavior: the Mediating Effects of Affective States and Creative Self-Efficacy in Teachers. Current Psychology, 36(4), 697–706.

Mangkunegara, A. A. P. (2005). “Evaluasi kinerja SDM.†Tiga Serangkai.

Pal, D., & Patra, S. (2021). University Students’ Perception of Video-Based Learning in Times of COVID-19: A TAM/TTF Perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37(10), 903–921.

Porath, C., SPREITZER, G., GIBSON, C., & GARNETT, F. G. (2012). Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(1), 5–22.

Prem, R., Ohly, S., Kubicek, B., & Korunka, C. (2017). Thriving on challenge stressors? Exploring time pressure and learning demands as antecedents of thriving at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(1), 108–123.

Rivai, V. and Basri, A. F. M. (2005). Performance Appraisal: Sistem Yang Tepat Menilai Kinerja Pegawai Dan Meningkatkan Daya Saing Perusahaan. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716.

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model Of Individual Innovation In The Workplace. Academy of ManagemenI Loumal, 37(3), 580–607.

Scott, S. G., Bruce, R. A., Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants Of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model Of Individual Innovation In The Workplace. Choice Reviews Online, 32(03), 32-1325-32–1325.

Siahaan, E., Gultom, P., & Lumbanraja, P. (2016). Improvement of employee banking performance based on competency improvement and placement working through career development (case study in Indonesia). In International Business Management (Vol. 10, Issue 3, pp. 255–261).

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Penerbit Alfabeta.

Zhou, J. and Shalley, C. E. (2008). Handbook of Organizational Creativity. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Jurnal Inspirasi Bisnis dan Manajemen is published by Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 4.0.

View My Stats