Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process
Edunomic: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Ekonomi (Scientific Journal of Economic Education) employs a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and academic integrity of all published articles. In this process, the identities of both the authors and the reviewers are kept confidential to maintain objectivity and impartiality during the evaluation.

All submitted manuscripts are assessed based on their relevance to the journal's scope, methodological soundness, depth of analysis, and contribution to knowledge and practice.

Review Process
1. Initial Screening
The editorial team conducts a preliminary evaluation to ensure the manuscript aligns with the journal's focus and scope, adheres to submission guidelines, and meets basic academic standards.

2. Double-Blind Peer Review
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to at least two independent reviewers. The identities of the authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the process.

3. Review Evaluation
Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on originality, methodology, clarity of presentation, significance of findings, and relevance to the field.

4. Decision Making
Based on the reviewers' comments, the editor makes one of the following decisions: accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject.

5. Revision Process
Authors are required to revise the manuscript according to the reviewers' feedback and resubmit it within the specified timeframe.

6. Final Decision
The final decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief based on the revised manuscript and the reviewers' recommendations.