Evaluation of the Suitability of Cable Dug Manhole Restoration to Road Conditions in Bandung City

Azalia Pradita Nur Aini; Annisa Amelia; Adytia Heru Nugraha; Raden Muhammad Alwan Faris Fadlirullah; Lutfhi Ahmad Barwanto

doi:10.33603/jki.v14i1.11685

Authors

Azalia Pradita Nur Aini Program Studi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Universitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia
Annisa Amelia Program Studi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Universitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia
Adytia Heru Nugraha Program Studi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Universitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia
Raden Muhammad Alwan Faris Fadlirullah Program Studi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Universitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia
Lutfhi Ahmad Barwanto Program Studi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Universitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2573-4887

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33603/jki.v14i1.11685

Keywords:

conformance-based evaluation, digital transformation, passive telecommunication infrastructure, urban planning

Abstract

The development of passive telecommunications infrastructure (IPT) plays an important role in supporting digital transformation and urban spatial planning. However, in Bandung City, underground cable excavation works as part of IPT development not only cause traffic disruption during implementation but also frequently degrade road pavement quality due to restoration processes that do not comply with technical standards. This study aims to evaluate the level of conformity of cable excavation manhole restoration in Bandung City with road construction regulations. The evaluation employs a conformance-based approach using a scoring technique applied to six technical indicators: the gap between the cover and frame, the presence of utility identification, the condition of the cover material, surface depressions or protrusions, surface uniformity, and elevation relative to the roadway. A total of 82 manhole locations across 16 road segments were observed to assess field restoration conditions. The results indicate that 84,14% of the locations fall into the “fair” category, 10,98% into the “poor” category, and only 4,88% meet the “good” category. These findings suggest that most post-excavation road restorations have not met the required technical standards, particularly with respect to surface evenness and utility identification. Such conditions affect safety risk levels and pavement performance. Therefore, consistent supervision and improvements in restoration quality are required to ensure that IPT development aligns with the principles of safety and sustainability of road infrastructure.

References

[1] A. L. C. Ferrer, A. M. T. Thomé, and A. J. Scavarda, “Sustainable urban infrastructure: A review,” Resour Conserv Recycl, vol. 128, pp. 360–372, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.07.017.

[2] D. M. Frangopol and M. Liu, “Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimization, and life-cycle cost∗,” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 29–41, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1080/15732470500253164.

[3] R. Sutriadi, D. A. Hadicahyono, and N. C. Drestalita, “Understanding a Smart Sustainable City Theme: A Case of Urban Innovation Performance in Bandung City, Indonesia,” International Journal of Technology, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 1143, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.14716/ijtech.v16i4.5531.

[4] V. Damayanti, F. S. Pradifta, L. A. Barwanto, M. E. Fadhillah, and G. R. Maulana, “Urban Esthetic Analysis of Bandung City,” MIMBAR: Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.29313/mimbar.v40i2.5045.

[5] E. Widayati, “Pengaruh Infrastruktur Terhadap Produktivitas Ekonomi di Pulau Jawa Periode 2000-2008,” Media Ekonomi, vol. 18, no. 1, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.25105/me.v18i1.8.

[6] A. G. Danastry and T. Kurniawan, “Tata Kelola Kolaboratif pada Penetrasi Jaringan Fixed Broadband di Indonesia,” Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 158–163, 2021.

[7] D. Subarna, D. Wisdianti, and M. Andriana, “Pengembangan Infrastruktur Kabel Serat Optik Bawah Tanah: Sarana Jaringan Utilitas Terpadu Kota Medan,” Jurnal Pembangunan Kota Medan, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35–47, 2024.

[8] R. D. Wirahadikusumah and F. Ferial, “Kajian Penerapan Pedoman Keselamatan Kerja pada Pekerjaan Galian Konstruksi,” Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 53, May 2010, doi: 10.5614/jts.2005.12.2.1.

[9] A. C. S. Iskandar, Andi Batari Angka, Muhammad Risal, Fachri Risky, and Muhammad Alif Ash’Siddiq, “Evaluasi Tingkat Kerusakan Jalan Sebagai Dasar Penentuan Perbaikan Jalan Kabupaten (Ruas Jalan Leworeng-Kessing Kab.Soppeng),” Journal of Applied Civil and Environmental Engineering, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 45–52, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.31963/jacee.v4i2.5128.

[10] B. Flyvbjerg, “Policy and Planning for Large-Infrastructure Projects: Problems, Causes, Cures,” Environ Plann B Plann Des, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 578–597, Aug. 2007, doi: 10.1068/b32111.

[11] I. K. Mohidin and F. Hermawanto, “Pengawasan Pembangunan Jaringan Fiber Optik pada Dinas Komunikasi Informatika dan Statistik Provinsi Gorontalo,” Jurnal Abdimas Gorontalo (JAG), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 32–38, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.30869/jag.v5i1.916.

[12] R. Susanti, “Identifikasi dan Penanganan Risiko K3 pada Proyek Jalan,” Bangunan: Teori, Praktek, Penelitian, dan Pengajaran Teknik Bangunan, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 55–68, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.17977/um071v27i22022p55-68.

[13] P. Healey, Collaborative Planning. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1997. doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-25538-2.

[14] M. Seasons, Evaluating Urban and Regional Plans: From Theory to Practice. UBC Press, 2021.

[15] M. L. Hariani and A. F. Firdaus, “Evaluasi Kinerja Simpang Tiga Jalan Jend. Sudirman - Jalan Raya Babakan Madang, Kab. Bogor,” Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur, vol. 10, no. 2, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.33603/jki.v10i2.7570.

[16] N. Chairunnisa, S. Asmara, D. Z. Syah, and L. A. Barwanto, “Evaluasi Kinerja Lalu Lintas Dampak Pembangunan Flyover Ciroyom Kota Bandung,” Jurnal Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Kebijakan, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 261–275, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.35472/jppk.v5i3.2400.

[17] D. Guyadeen and M. Seasons, “Plan Evaluation: Challenges and Directions for Future Research,” Planning Practice and Research, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 215–228, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1080/02697459.2015.1081335.

[18] V. Oliveira and P. Pinho, “Evaluation in urban planning: Advances and prospects,” J Plan Lit, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 343–361, 2010, doi: 10.1177/0885412210364589.

[19] L. A. Barwanto and R. Sutriadi, “Branding Kota, Upaya Terstruktur atau Hanya Gagasan Konseptual: Evaluasi Terhadap Dokumen Perencanaan di Kota Bandung,” Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 11–23, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.29313/jpwk.v19i1.3567.

[20] J. Li, G. Li, J. Li, and A. Liu, “Integrating conformance and performance for the evaluation of urban planning implementation from a goal-oriented perspective,” Environ Plan B Urban Anal City Sci, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 737–753, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1177/23998083211025535.