Guidelines for Analysis of Accessibility and Connectivity of Tourism Transportation in Banyuwangi Regency

Authors

  • Lilla anjani Birahmatika Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Indonesia
  • Askia Esa Aulia Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Indonesia
  • Garin Yacub Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Indonesia
  • Ervina Ahyudanari Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33603/jki.v13i3.10644

Keywords:

Accessibility, Connectivity, Sustainable Trourism, Banyuwangi Tourism

Abstract

Banyuwangi Regency, located in East Java, Indonesia, has rapidly emerged as a leading tourism destination due to its exceptional natural beauty and cultural richness. The increasing number of domestic and international tourist visits requires adequate transport infrastructure to ensure accessibility and connectivity across major destinations. Without a well-functioning transport system, the tourism sector may face barriers to sustainable growth and equitable regional development. Accessibility is defined as the ease with which tourists can reach specific destinations, whereas connectivity reflects the degree of linkage and travel efficiency between those destinations. This study seeks to analyze the performance of the tourism transport system in Banyuwangi by applying the Hansen accessibility model, using both to assess spatial accessibility and inter-destination connectivity. Primary data were collected by measuring the distances between selected tourist destinations (ODTWs) along existing transport routes through Google Maps. Secondary data were obtained from the Banyuwangi Regency Tourism Office, including records of tourist arrival volumes. The results show that accessibility values range from 0.0067 to 0.07, while connectivity values vary between 0.87 and 1.09. These findings reveal significant disparities in transport service distribution and functional integration between routes. The study emphasizes the urgent need for strategic planning and investment in transport systems tailored to the dynamics of tourism flows. Enhancing transport accessibility and connectivity is essential not only to support tourist mobility but also to promote inclusive and sustainable tourism development across the region.

References

[1] U. UNTWO, O. Conference, I. Coastal, Z. Management, and A. Sids, “UN Tourism ’ s ( World Tourism Organization ) contribution to the Secretary- General ’ s background note for the preparatory meeting of the 2025 United Nations Conference to Support the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 14,” no. 34, 2025.

[2] I. Fajarin and B. Fitanto, “Analisis Daya Saing Sektor Pariwisata Kabupaten Banyuwangi : Pendekatan Competitiveness Monitor Dan Porter ’ S Diamond,” 2020.

[3] L. Yang, Sustainable City Planning and Development: Transport and Land Use, vol. 15, no. 22. 2023.

[4] M. N. Postorino and G. M. L. Sarnè, “A New Approach to Assessing Transport Network Resilience,” Urban Sci., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2025, doi: 10.3390/urbansci9020035.

[5] L. A. Birahmatika and E. Ahyudanari, “Jurnal Aplikasi Teknik Sipil Analisis Clustering Objek Daya Tarik Wisata Kabupaten Banyuwangi,” J. Apl. Tek. Sipil, vol. 20, pp. 385–390, 2022.

[6] T. Judiantono and D. Mukhsin, “Determining Strategy to Improve Tourism Transportation Services,” no. January, pp. 2–7, 2020, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.200225.136.

[7] N. M. Maulana Muhammad Akbar, “Analisis Pengaruh Fasilitas Dan Aksesibilitas Terhadap Minat Kunjungan Wisatawan Pada Destinasi Geopark Silokek Sijunjung Maulana,” J. Ekon. dan Bisnis, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 750–769, 2025.

[8] P. N. Narwastuti, P. Rahayu, and B. S. Pujantiyo, “Analisis Aksesibilitas Pariwisata Menuju Kawasan Objek Wisata (Studi Kasus: Kawasan Wisata Air di Kecamatan Polanharjo),” Cakra Wisata J. Pariwisata dan Budaya, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 52–67, 2024.

[9] P. Şahin Körmeçli, “Accessibility of Urban Tourism in Historical Areas: Analysis of UNESCO World Heritage Sites in Safranbolu,” Sustain. , vol. 16, no. 6, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16062485.

[10] J. Chen, M. Li, and C. Xie, “Transportation connectivity strategies and regional tourism economy - empirical analysis of 153 cities in China,” Tour. Rev., vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 113–128, 2022, doi: 10.1108/TR-03-2021-0134.

[11] P. Peeters, J. Higham, S. Cohen, E. Eijgelaar, and S. Gössling, “Desirable tourism transport futures,” J. Sustain. Tour., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 173–188, 2019, doi: 10.1080/09669582.2018.1477785.

[12] Wasatch Front Regional Council et al., “Utah Street Connectivity Guide,” no. March, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Citation Check