THE APPLICATION OF DWANGSOM IN THE EXECUTION OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT DECISIONS IN INDONESIA FROM A JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v10i1.10904Kata Kunci:
Dwangsom, Execution of the Verdict, JusticeAbstrak
Article 116 paragraph (4) of Law Number 51 of 2009 stipulates that officials who do not implement decisions of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) that have permanent legal force may be subject to coercive measures in the form of forced money (dwangsom) and/or administrative sanctions. This study aims to: first, analyze the legal regulations on dwangsom in the execution of PTUN decisions in Indonesia; second, examine the application of dwangsom by judges in judicial practice; third, examine the implications of the application of dwangsom from a justice perspective. The method used is normative juridical with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. Data were obtained from primary and secondary legal materials, analyzed qualitatively, with a case study on Decision Number 13/G/2016/PTUN.TPI. The results of the study indicate that the regulation of dwangsom in the execution of PTUN decisions is still partial and not supported by technical regulations. Article 116 paragraph (4) of Law Number 51 of 2009 is not accompanied by detailed guidelines so that its application depends on the judge's initiative and the plaintiff's request, without quantitative or procedural standards. In fact, dwangsom has the potential to be an effective means of pressuring officials to comply with decisions voluntarily and in a timely manner. Weak technical regulations and an unresponsive legal culture have limited its effectiveness. The conclusion of this study confirms that the dwangsom plays a strategic role in ensuring legal certainty and protecting the public's rights from arbitrary government action. Comprehensive technical regulations and the establishment of an independent national enforcement agency are recommended to ensure the practical implementation of PTUN decisions. Thus, dwangsom can function effectively as an instrument for upholding the rule of law and providing justice for those seeking justice.
Referensi
Books:
I Gede Pantja Astawa, Dynamics of Law and Legislation in Indonesia, (Bandung: PT. Alumni, 2012).
John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).
Muchsan, Supervision System for the Actions of Government Officials and State Administrative Courts in Indonesia, (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2007).
Muhaimin, Legal Research Methods, (Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020)
Padmo Wahyono, Some Constitutional Problems in Indonesia, (Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia,1984).
Paulus Effendi Lotulung, In Re-examining the Main Ideas of the Founders of State Administrative Courts in Indonesia, (Jakarta: Institute for Research and Development of State Administrative Law, 2003).
Paulus Efendi, The Role of Jurisprudence as a Source of Law, (Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasonal Departemen Kehakiman, 1998).
Philipus M. Hadjon, Legal Protection for the Indonesian People: A Study of Its Principles, Its Handling by the Courts in the General Court Environment and the Formation of the State Administrative Court, (Surabaya: PT Bina Ilmu, 1987).
S,F. Marbun, State Administrative Court and State Administrative Efforts, (Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2011).
Soegijatno Tjakranegara, Indonesian State Administrative Court Procedural Law, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1994).
SF Marbun and Moh Mahfud MD, Principles of State Administrative Law, (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1987).
Suteki, Introduction to Legal Research, (Depok: Raja Grafindo, 2022).
Soerjono Soekanto, Introduction to Legal Research, (Jakarta : UI Press, 2006).
Yulius, Problems of Execution of State Administrative Officials and Discourse on State Execution Institutions, (Lampung: Aura, 2019).
Zulkarnaen and Dewi Mayaningsih, Administrative Court Procedure Law in Indonesia, (Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2018).
Zainuddin Ali, Introduction to Legal Research, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016).
Journal:
Asep Muhidin, “Legal Certainty Regarding the Implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions That Have Permanent Legal Force”, Al-Afkar: Journal for Islamic Studies, Vol. 6 Number 4 Year 2023, p. 418.
Bambang Heriyanto, 2021, “Legal Review of the Implementation of Coercive Money (Dwangsom) in State Administrative Courts”, Center for Legal and Judicial Research and Development, Directorate General of Military and State Administrative Courts, Vol. 4 Number 2 Year 2021, p. 150.
Edi Rohaedi, Nandang Kusnadi, Bambang Heriyanto, dan Nuradi, “The Position of Compulsory Money (Dwangsom) in the Execution of State Administrative Court Decisions”, Pakuan Law Review (PALAR), Vol. 9, No. 2, 2023, p. 121
Fauziah Lubis dan Gozali Ilyas, “Application of the Principle of Legal Certainty in the Process of Executing Judges' Decisions to the Losing Party in Civil Cases”, Jurnal Hukum Progresif, Vol. 7 Number 6 Year 2024, p. 114.
Raihan Andhika Santoso, et.al., “"The Position and Legal Power of the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) in Indonesian Positive Law" in the Deposition: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum, Volume. 1., Number 4., 2023, p. 13.
Sri Redjeki Slamet, dkk, “Dwangsom as an Effort to Force a Judge's Decision ”, Lex Jurnalica, Vol. 20 Number 2 Year 2023, p. 239
Silvia Rahmawati Lahopang, “Legal Review of the Execution Process of State Administrative Court Decisions” Jurnal Lex Administratum, Volume 6., Number. 3., (2018), p. 161.
Vidi Siami Mulyanti, dkk, “Legal Analysis of the Legal Certainty of the Execution of Supreme Court Decision Number 109/Pk/Pdt/2022 in the Dago Elos Case Reviewed Based on Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles”, Journal of Public and State Administration Law, Vol. 2 No. 1 Year 2025, p. 73.
Zulkifli, M Azizi, Nur Hidayat, & Peri Pirmansyah, 2025. “Legal Review of the Provisions on Coercive Money Sanctions (Dwangsom) in the Implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions Based on Law Number 51 of 2009 Concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 Concerning State Administrative Courts”. Journal of Sharia and Law, Vol. 3 Number 4, p. 1198.
Court Ruling:
Decision of the State Administrative Court at the Tanjungpinang State Administrative Court in Budi Saputra vs. Head of the Karimun Regency Land Office and Nathan Wahyudianto and Haris alias Tjap Hiok, Number 13/G/2016/PTUN.TPI, p. 65.
Decision of the State Administrative Court at the Tanjungpinang State Administrative Court in Budi Saputra vs. Head of the Karimun Regency Land Office and Nathan Wahyudianto and Haris alias Tjap Hiok, Number 13/G/2016/PTUN.TPI, p. 19.
Decision of the State Administrative Court at the Tanjungpinang State Administrative Court in Budi Saputra vs. Head of the Karimun Regency Land Office and Nathan Wahyudianto and Haris alias Tjap Hiok, Number 13/G/2016/PTUN.TPI, p. 65.
Tesis:
Vivi, 2024, “The Principle of Legal Certainty in the Implementation of an International Arbitration Decision ”, Tesis, Law Study Program, Postgraduate School, Pakuan University, Bogor.
Website:
Bambang Heriyanto, Implementation of Dwangsom in the Decision of the State Apparatus (Quo Vadis Dwangom in the PTUN), Material Presented in the Reboan Series-19 Discussion, Bandung, October 27, 2021, quoted fromhttps://www.youtube.com/live/uowuqnn1hbg?si=kmgsxtwkt3iwu7sb accessed on August 2, 2025.
KY, Noer, dan esty, “CHA Mustamar: The weakness of the PTUN lies in the execution of decisions which are often ignored.”, [10/07/24] https://www.komisiyudisial.go.id/frontend/news_detail/15669/cha-mustamar-kelemahan-ptun-terletak-pada-eksekusi-putusan-yang-sering-diabaikan, [20/06/25]
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Citation Check
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Effendi, Ardiansyah, Robert Libra
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal HERMENUTIKA, Sekolah Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum. Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Jurnal HERMENEUTIKA, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Jurnal HERMENEUTIKA are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
