THE PENALTY OF ADULTRY ACCORDING TO QANUN ACEH NUMBER 6 OF 2014 ARTICLE 33 AND THE BOOK OF CRIMINAL LAW (KUHP) ARTICLE 284 IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF THEORY OF LEGAL EFFECTIVENESS

Panji Satrio Dewandaru

Sari


The punishment for adultery is an attempt by the Aceh government to revive Islamic law in Aceh, which was implemented during the time of Sultan Iskandar Muda. The Criminal Code (KUHP) Article 284 concerning adultery has been applied from the Dutch era to the present. Qanun Jinayat Aceh concerning Punishment for Adultery with the Criminal Code (KUHP) Article 284 concerning adultery is examined from the perspective of legal effectiveness. This research is a comparative study that discusses the punishment for adultery according to Qanun Aceh Number 6 of 2014 Article 33 and the Criminal Code (KUHP) Article 284. Apart from that, this type of research studies, analyses, and researches Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014 Article 33 and the Criminal Code (KUHP) Article 284, supported by sociological data. This research is descriptive and comparative, namely collecting data and explaining how the sociological review of the law on adultery punishment according to Qanun Aceh Number 6 of 2014 Article 33 and the Criminal Code (KUHP) Article 284 by comparing the two legal objects. The results of this study prove that the application of caning punishment for adulterers in Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam and the Criminal Code is sufficient to provide a deterrent effect for society. This is due to aspects of the Aceh Qanun. The Government of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam has been consistent with the legal norms that have been legalized to take action against people who commit acts of adultery. From the aspect of the Criminal Code, the law that is applied is still following the legal process established for married couples who commit adultery by committing adultery.

Kata Kunci


Adultery Punishment; Aceh Qanun; Criminal Code

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Alyasa, Abu Bakar. (2004). Syariat Islam di Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam-Paradigma, Kebijakan dan Kegiatan, Banda Aceh: Dinas Syariat Islam

Ananda, S. (2008) Tentang Kaidah Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia, 26 (1), 68-78

Forse, Michel, Anthony Giddens, Daniel Bell. (2005) Sosiologi, Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana,

Hadi, Amirul. ( 2010) Aceh Sejarah,Budaya, dan Tradisi,( Jakarta, Yayasan Obor Indonesia)

Lamintang. (1990) Delik-Delik Khusus: Tindak Pidana-Tindak Pidana yang Melanggar Norma-Norma Kesusilaan dan Kepatutan, Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Mardani. (2009) Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama Dan Mahkamah Syariah, Jakarta:Sinar Grafika

Moelyatno. (2008) KUHP Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Jakarta:Bumi Aksara.

Munajat, Makhrus. (2010) Fiqh Jinayah, Yogyakarta: Pesantren Nawesea Press.

Purbacaraka, Purnadi. (1974) Perihal Kaidah Hukum, Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Said, Muhammad (1981) Aceh Sepanjang Abad Medan: P.T. Percetakan dan Penerbitan Wapada Medan.

Saebani, Beni Ahmad H. Encup Supriatna. (2012) Antropologi Hukum, (Bandung, Pustaka Setia)

Soekanto, Soerjano.(1978) Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Cetakan VI, Jakarta: Yayasan Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.

Sudrajat dan Subana. (2001) Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Ilmiyah, Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Suni Ismail. (1980) Bunga Rampai Tentang Aceh, Jakarta: Bhratara Karya Aksara

Tebba, Sudirman. (2003) Sosiologi Hukum Islam, Yogyakarta: UII Press Yogyakarta,

Wardi, Muslich Ahmad. (2006) Pengantar dan Asas Hukum Pidana Islam, Jakarta:Sinar Grafika.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v7i2.8735

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


execute(); ?>