ANALYSIS KEBUTUHAN PEMBELAJARAN GEOMETRI BERBASIS AUGMENTED REALITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33603/e.v13i1.11803Keywords:
Augmented Reality, Geometry, Needs Analysis, Interactive Learning Media, GamificationAbstract
This study presents a comprehensive data analysis of an Augmented Reality (AR)-based geometry learning needs survey of 29 student respondents. The analysis includes user profiles based on gender, evaluation of geometry learning interests and difficulties, preferences for interactive media and educational games, level of AR technology recognition, attitudes toward learning innovations, and student learning motivation. Methods used include data visualization, descriptive statistical analysis, gender comparison, and categorical analysis to identify patterns of student needs and areas for development of learning media. The results provide strategic insights into geometry interests with an average score of 3.13/4.0 (78.2% agreement level), high preference for interactive media (3.08/4.0 or 77.1%), but still low AR recognition (2.30/4.0 or 57.5%). The main findings show a gap between high interest in interactive learning and low recognition of AR technology, indicating an urgent need for socialization programs and development of game-based AR learning media for geometry. The minimal gender gap (maximum 0.28 points) allows for the implementation of universal strategies without the need for significant gender-based customization.
References
Angraini, L. M., Kusuma, D. A., Wahyuni, R., Noto, M. S., Wahyuni, A., Susilawati, A., & Reza, D. (2025). Augmented Reality ( AR ) For Geometry Based On Prior Mathematical Knowledge. 20(2), 182–189.
Angraini, L. M., Noto, M. S., & Muhammad, I. (2024). Augmented Reality – Based Learning Media on Mathematical Computational Thinking Ability. 31(2).
Angraini, L. M., Susilawati, A., Noto, M. S., Wahyuni, R., & Andrian, D. (2024). Indonesian Journal of Science & Technology Augmented Reality for Cultivating Computational Thinking Skills in Mathematics Completed with Literature Review , Bibliometrics , and Experiments for Students. 9, 225–260.
Angraini, L. M., & Yolanda, F. (2023). Augmented Reality : The Improvement of
Computational Thinking Based on Students ’ Initial Mathematical Ability. 16(3), 1033–1054.
Barnas, S., & Ridwan, I. M. (2019). Perbedaan Gender dalam Pengetahuan , Sikap dan Perilaku Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika. 1(2), 34–41.
Bond, M., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Nichols, M. (2021). Revisiting five decades of educational technology research: A content and authorship analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13138
Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2023). Gamification in education: Where are we in 2023? Educational Technology Research and Development, 71, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10191-4
Fariqoh, A., Sutriyani, W., & Zumrotun, E. (2025). Pengaruh Game Based Learning Berbasis Augmented Reality terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Bangun Ruang SD. 5, 1243–1253.
Hidayat, W., & Prabawanto, S. (2020). Students’ interest and motivation in mathematics learning using interactive media. Infinity Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(2), 123–134.
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581
Ibáñez, M. B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002
Lowrie, T., Logan, T., & Hegarty, M. (2022). The influence of spatial reasoning on mathematics learning. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 54, 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01311-1
Nurwijaya, S., & Sukaria, M. I. (2025). Augmented Reality ( AR ) Dalam Pembelajaran Geometri : Dampak Pada Spasial Reasoning Siswa. 10, 471–481.
Putri, D. A., & Ramdhani, M. A. (2022). Gamification-based learning media to improve students’ motivation and engagement. Infinity Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(1), 67–78.
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for education. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 2843–2875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10089-9
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w
Sari, R., & Mulyadi, D. (2021). Data preprocessing techniques in educational data analysis. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 5(2), 89–98.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Sánchez Viveros, B. (2019). The technology acceptance model in educational technology: A meta-analytic approach. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Schleicher, A., & Sun, J. (2022). Digital learning, gender, and equity in education. OECD Education Working Papers, 258, 1–28.
Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432–2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Euclid
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author who published his work in this journal agrees to the following terms:
The author reserves the copyright and grants the first publishing rights journal, with works simultaneously licensed under the License: Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 Internasional License that enables others to share works with the acknowledgment of early publication and authorship of the work in this journal.
