MEMBANGUN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR LOGIS DENGAN MIND MAPPING: METODE KREATIF DALAM PENDIDIKAN
(Quasi Eksperimen pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Ekonomi Universitas Kuningan)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33603/ejpe.v13i2.10172Abstract
This study aims to enhance the logical thinking skills of students through the application of the mind mapping method in studying microeconomics, namely on the topic "Consumer Behavior." Utilizing a quasi-experimental research design with a one-group pretest-posttest model, the study was carried out on 18 students of the Economics Education Study Program of Kuningan University. Data was collected through tests of logical thinking and classroom observations and analyzed using the Wilcoxon test. Outcome of the analysis was that the average score increased from 62.17 in pre-test to 75.67 in post-test. There was an improvement in the median, mode, minimum, and maximum as well as the decrease of the standard deviation, which meant that student learning outcomes became symmetrical. The Wilcoxon test provided a p-value of 7.63 × 10⁻6 (< 0.05), which confirmed that there was a considerable difference between post-test and pre-test scores. A measure of effect size 0.88 shows an extremely significant effect of the Mind Mapping technique on the students' logical thinking capability. From observations in the classrooms, it was also revealed that students improved in identifying information, establishing cause-and-effect relationships, classifying data, developing evidence-based arguments, and drawing logical conclusions. Therefore, it can be argued that the use of the Mind Mapping learning technique significantly enhances students' critical thinking ability through the reinforcement of knowledge and concepts, thereby their performance in microeconomics, particularly in the topic of consumer behavior.
Keywords: mind mapping, logical thinking skills, active learning, microeconomics.
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Ardat, M. (2014). Pembelajaran inovatif untuk pendidikan abad 21. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Buzan, T. (2007). The mind map book: Unlock your creativity, boost your memory, change your life. London: BBC Active.
Buzan, T. (2010). The mind map book: Unlock your creativity, boost your memory, change your life (Revised ed.). London: BBC Active.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ennis, R. H. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43(2), 44–48.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Learning as activity: A conversation of ideas in cognitive science. Educational Technology, 40(4), 45–51.
Kemendikbudristek. (2024). Laporan capaian pembelajaran mahasiswa di pendidikan tinggi Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Khasanah, N. (2016). Penerapan mind mapping dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir logis mahasiswa (Laporan Penelitian Tidak Diterbitkan). Universitas Kuningan.
Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Pensacola, FL: Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them (Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008). Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nuryatin, A. (2015). Pengaruh pembelajaran kooperatif tipe group investigation terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis. Jurnal Equilibrium, 12.
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Santrock, J. W. (2012). Educational psychology (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Woolfolk, A. (2009). Educational psychology (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher-order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145–181. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Edunomic Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Penulis yang menerbitkan karyanya ke jurnal ini setuju dengan persyaratan berikut:
Penulis menyimpan hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama, dengan karya yang secara serentak dilisensikan di bawah Lisensi: Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 Internasional License yang memungkinkan orang lain membagikan karya dengan pengakuan penerbitan awal dan kepenulisan karya di jurnal ini.