Optimization Of Mixing Chamber Design on Steam Ejector at Geothermal Power Plant Based on CFD Simulation

Authors

  • S. S. Rusdan Politeknik Negeri Bandung
  • Y. Suprianti Politeknik Negeri Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33603/jgst.v9i3.10689

Keywords:

NCG, Steam ejector, Mixing chamber, Entrainment ratio, CFD

Abstract

The initial generation capacity of 30 MW at the Geothermal Power Plant (GPP) decreased to 11.88 MW due to reduced steam supply from production wells. This mismatch between the original system design and current operating conditions affected components such as the steam ejector, which experienced a reduction in motive steam flow from 1.96 kg/s to 1.66 kg/s. As a result, the mixing chamber became inefficient in entraining flow of non- condensable gases (NCG), causing suboptimal pressure ratios (P3/P5), turbulence, and backflow. This study aims to redesign the mixing chamber of the steam ejector to enhance the extraction NCG. Using compressible flow theory and CFD simulation with Ansys Fluent 2025R1, the redesigned geometry improved the entrainment ratio from 0.27 to 0.31 and increased the NCG suction rate from 0.45 kg/s to 0.52 kg/s. The pressure ratio P3/P5 rose from 0.04 to 0.07, approaching optimal conditions. Further analysis revealed that under increased motive flow (1.687 kg/s), the ejector achieved an entrainment ratio of 0.32, and under lowered condenser pressure (8.1 kPa), the entrainment reached 0.34. These two optimal conditions demonstrate the redesigned chamber’s adaptability under varied operational scenarios. The performance improvement contributed to an additional power output of 41.68 kWh, approaching the plant’s installed capacity and improving system reliability. From economic perspective, the optimization is also feasible, yielding a net present value (NPV) of Rp6.46 million and demonstrating high profitability and practical applicability.

References

[1] N. A. Pambudi, “Thermodynamic and economic analysis of combined single and double flash cycle for geothermal power plant,” Renew. Energy, vol. 116, pp. 98–107, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.041.

[2] A. Horas, H. R. Silaban, and E. K. Sinaga, “Effect of NCG removal on power output in geothermal power plant,” J. Rekayasa Proses, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 39–44, 2023, doi: 10.14710/jrekpros.17.1.39-44.

[3] H. Pan, Y. Wang, Y. Ma, and Y. Lin, “Numerical investigation of geometric effects on steam ejector performance under unsteady flow,” Energy, vol. 193, p. 116745, 2020.

[4] “Internal Operational Report,” 2024.

[5] V. Singhal, S. Sinha, and D. Mahanta, “Design, CFD analysis and performance evaluation of the steam jet ejector,” Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol., vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 451–459, 2017.

[6] H. Zheng, J. Li, H. He, Y. Duan, and Y. Zhang, “Optimization analysis of the mixing chamber and diffuser of ejector based on Fanno flow model,” Energy, vol. 235, p. 121340, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121340.

[7] H. Yan, Q. Liu, D. He, and Y. Cao, “Optimization of two-phase ejector mixing chamber length under varied liquid volume fraction,” Int. J. Refrig., vol. 147, pp. 226–236, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2023.01.019.

[8] C. Cai, Q. Chen, and Y. Zhu, “A study of steam ejector performance under various operating conditions,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 31, no. 16, pp. 3294–3301, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.06.028.

[9] H. El-Dessouky, H. Ettouney, I. Alatiqi, and G. Al-Nuwaibit, “Evaluation of steam jet ejectors,” Chem. Eng. Process., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 551–561, 2002.

[10] ANSYS Inc., “ANSYS Fluent User’s Guide, Release 2023 R1,” 2023, Canonsburg, PA, USA. [Online]. Available: https://www.ansys.com/products/fluids/ansys-fluent

[11] Badan Standarisasi Nasional, SNI 03-2847-2002: Tata Cara Perhitungan Struktur Beton untuk Bangunan Gedung. Jakarta: BSN, 2002.

[12] M. S. Peters, K. D. Timmerhaus, and R. E. West, Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003.

[13] United States Department of Energy (DOE), “Geothermal Electricity Technology Evaluation Model (GETEM) Manual,” 2013, Idaho National Laboratory.

[14] PLN, “Tarif Tenaga Listrik PT PLN (Persero) Tahun 2023,” 2023, Jakarta. [Online]. Available: https://web.pln.co.id

[15] Bank Indonesia, “Laporan Perekonomian Indonesia 2023,” 2024, Jakarta. [Online]. Available: https://www.bi.go.id

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31