AMICUS CURIAEAS ONE OF THE TOOLS OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROOF IN COURT
Sari
Judicial power is an independent power to administer justice in order to uphold law and justice, regardless of the influence of government power, as required by Article 24 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The research method used in this research is a normative juridical method, namely research that examines legal norms and effectiveness of the enactment of positive law in society. The results of the study show that the legal force of proof of Amicus Curiae in court is normatively based on the provisions of Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power and Article 180 paragraph (1) of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law. In the Judicial Powers Act, judges are required to explore the values that grow and develop in society regarding justice. A concept called Amicus Curiae, but not specifically institutionalized in the criminal justice system in Indonesia, currently requires a legal basis. The legal certainty of Amicus Curiae in proving procedures in court and in the Indonesian legal system is that the position of Amicus Curiae cannot be categorized as evidence contained in the Criminal Procedure Code. Amicus Curiae is a new piece of evidence that does not have a standard form, because it has not been regulated clearly or formally in existing laws and regulations. For this reason, in order to provide guarantees of legal certainty, a regulation is needed that regulates the use and application of Amicus Curiae in criminal cases.
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Abdul Manan, Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama, cet. ke-5, Kencana, Jakarta, 2008.
Abdulkadir Muhammad, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2012.
Achmad Ali dan Wiwie Heryani, Asas-Asas Hukum Pembuktian Perdata, Kencana, Jakarta, 2012.
Ahmad Rifai, Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim, Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2018.
Anak Agung Gde Rahmadi dan I Nyoman Budiana, “Amicus Curiae Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Di Pengadilan”, Jurnal Kertha Semaya, Volume 9 Nomor 2, (2021).
Aris Bintania, Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama dalam Kerangka Fiqh al-Qadha, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2012.
Azman Rishad, Peran Amicus Curiae Bagi Hakim Dalam menjatuhkan Putusan di Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia, Karya Tulis Ilmiah, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 2018.
Dominikus Rato, Filsafat Hukum Mencari: Memahami dan Memahami Hukum, Laksbang Pressindo, Yogyakarta, 2010.
Fadil Aulia dan Muchlas Rastra Samara Muksin, “The Position of Amicus Curiae under the Indonesian Law of Evidence”, Jurnal Media Hukum, Volume 27, Nomor 2, hlm. 218, (Desember 2020).
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2009.
LBH Jakarta, Amicus Curiae (Amicus Brief) pada perkara Penodaan Agama Sdr. Basuki Tjahaja Purnama alias Ahok, LBH Jakarta, Jakarta, 2017.
M. Fauzan, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syar’iyah di Indonesia, Kencana, Jakarta, 2005.
M. Natsir Asnawi, Hermeneutika Putusan Hakim, Yogyakarta: UUI Press, 2020.
Mohammad Nurul Huda, Pentingnya Alat Bukti dalam Pembuktian Minim Saksi, Voice Justisia: Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan 1, No. 2, 2017.
Ni Putu Widyaningsih, “Amicus Curiae Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana Anak Sebagai Pengguna Narkotika”, Jurnal Kertha Semaya, Volume 8 Nomor 7, (2020).
Niken Savitri, Pembuktian Dalam Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 4, No. 2, 2020.
Nurul Qamar, Perbandingan Sistem Hukum dan Peradilan Civil Law System dan Common Law System, Makassar, Pustaka Refleksi, 2010.
Roihan A. Rasyid, Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2006.
Samuel Krislov, “The Amicus Curiae Brief: From Friendship to Advocacy”, Journal, vol. 72 YALE L.J. 694, (1963).
Sudikno Mertokusumo, Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1998.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v7i1.8476
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.