CRIMINAL AGAINST ASSISTANT (MEDEPLICHTIGE) IN CASES OF EMBRACTION IN OFFICE AND FRAUD (CASE STUDY OF DECISION OF CENTRAL JAKARTA STATE COURT NUMBER 1194/PID.B/2018/PN JKT.SEL)

Joelyan Joelyan

Sari


At present the legal subjects involved in criminal acts are not only one person but now this has been carried out jointly or by more than one person, there are those who commit crimes and there are those who act as orders to commit crimes, whether those who order them to commit crimes , participating in committing, persuading to commit or even committing the act itself and there are also those who assist in criminal acts. The research method used is normative juridical, namely library law research which is carried out by examining library materials or secondary data. The results of the research include that the form or form of participation in deelneming is participating in medeplegen and assistance (medeplichtigheid) contained in Articles 55 and Article 56 of the Criminal Code (KUHP). According to the formulation of the criminal provisions in Article 55 of the Criminal Code, it reads: (1) Punished as the perpetrators of a crime, namely: 1. Those who commit, order to commit or who participate in committing; 2. Those who, by giving gifts, promises, by abusing power or reputation, by force, by threat or by causing misunderstandings or by providing opportunities, means or information, have deliberately moved other people to commit criminal acts. concerned. (2) Regarding those mentioned last, what can be accounted for is only the actions that they have deliberately moved others to do, along with the consequences. While the criminal provisions in Article 56 of the Criminal Code according to the formulation reads: (1). Those who have knowingly provided assistance in committing the crime. (2). Those who intentionally provide opportunities, means or information to commit the crime.


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Adami Chazawi, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Teori-Teori Pemidanaan & Batas Berlakunya Hukum Pidana, (Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo)

Agung maruli, 2017, Pertanggungjawban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Penyertaan Tindak Pidana Pornografi Menurut UU No 44 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pornografi, Jurnal, Medan : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara

Aknes Susanty Sambulele, 2013, Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Penyertaan Dalam Tindak Pidana (Pasal 55 dan 56 KUHP), Lex Crimen Vol. II/No.7/November/2013

Andi Hamzah, 2014, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi, Rineka Cipta.

CST Kansil. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Balai Pustaka ,Jakarta,1989.

Erdianto Efendi, . 2011. Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Refika Aditama. Bandung

Hamsir, Pengantar Hukum Pidana Dan Hukum Acara Pidana (Analisis Sosiologis pasal- pasal tertentu dalam KUHP dan KUHAP) (Makassar: Alauddin University Press, 2013)

Ismu Gunadi. Jonaedi Efendi, Cepat & Mudah Memahami Hukum Pidana, (Jakarta, Prenadamedia Group, 2014),

Kitab Undang- Undang Hukum Pidana & Kitab Hukum Acara Pidana, ( Cet. IX; Bandung: Citra Umbara, 2013 )

Lawrence M. Friedman, 2011.Sistem Hukum Perspektif Ilmu Sosial,Bandung NusaMedia,

Leden Marpaung SH. 2012. Asas Teori Praktik Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta

Niniek Suparni, SH. 2007. “ Eksistensi Pidana Denda Dalam Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaanâ€. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta,

Philipus M. Hadjon. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Bina Ilmu ,Surabaya, 1987

Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1990

Satjipto Raharjo, Ilmu Hukum , Bandung : PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.

Soedjono Dirdjosiswoyo, Ruang Lingkup Kriminologi, (Bandung, Remaja Karya, 1984)

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Bunga Rampai Ilmu Hukum, (Yogyakarta, Liberty, 1984)

Tampil Anshari, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum: Penulisan Skripsi, (Medan: Pustaka Bangsa Press, 2005)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v6i3.8325

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


execute(); ?>