Perilaku Pemecahan Masalah Mahasiswa pada Perkuliahan Kalkulus Secara Daring

Yulyanti Harisman, Khairani Khairani

Sari


Abstrak. Perilaku pemecahan masalah matematis siswa belum maksimal, dimana masih banyak siswa yang berorientasi pada perilaku apatis. Orientasi perilaku tersebut diperoleh dari hasil kajian ahli dengan melakukan penelitian diberbagai tingkat sekolah, mulai dari sekolah dasar sampai keperguruan tinggi pada proses pembelajaran tatap muka, masih jarang kajian perilaku pemecahan masalah siswa pada proses pembelajaran daring.  Penelitian ini berfokus bagaimana perilaku pemecahan masalah mahasiswa pada proses pembelajaran daring. Pendekatan kualitatif studi kasus dilakukan dengan 27 mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika yang mengambil mata kuliah kalkulus sebagai subjek penelitian. Mahasiswa diberikan modul, video pembelajaran dan masalah – masalah yang diupload pada e-learning. Pada pertemuan akhir mahasiswa diberikan soal pemecahan masalah, dilanjutkan dengan proses wawancara mengenai jawaban yang telah dituliskan. Proses wawancara didokumentasikan dengan video. Lembar jawaban dan video setiap siswa ditranskripsikan dan dikelompokkan menggunakan rubrik perilaku pemecahan masalah. Aspek perilaku pemecahan masalah matematis meliputi: kepemilikan pengetahuan, pengendalian diri (kontrol), keyakinan, dan afektif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kategori perilaku pada pembelajaran daring sama dengan kategori perilaku pada pembelajaran langsung untuk materi turunan parsial, yaitu terdiri dari naif, rutin, dan canggih. Hasil Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pembelajaran daring dapat lebih dimaksimalkan dengan baik dengan menggunakan berbagai fitur teknologi, profesionalisme pendidik dalam mengajar, kemampuan belajar mandiri siswa dan lain sebagainya.

Kata Kunci: Pembelajaran Daring, Pemecahan Masalah, Perilaku. 


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1991). Educational Studies in Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 37–68.

Buttner, E. H., & Black, A. N. (2014). Assessment of the Effectiveness of an Online Learning System in Improving Student Test Performance. Journal of Education for Business, 89(5), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2013.869530

Carducci, A., Federigi, I., Dasheng, L., Julian R, T., & Marco, V. (2020). Making Waves: Coronavirus Detection, Presence And Persistence in the Water Environment: State of the Art and Knowledge Needs for Public Health. Water Research, 179, 115907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115907

Cohen, M. R. (1981). Problem Solving as a Goal of Energy and Environmental Education. Journal of Environmental Education, 13(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1981.9943019

Chou, P. (2012). Effect of Students’ Self-Directed Learning Abilities on Online Learning Outcomes: Two Exploratory Experiments in Electronic Engineering. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(6), 172–179.

Dong, E., Du, H., & Gardner, L. (2020). An Interactive Web-Based Dashboard to Track COVID-19 in Real Time. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 20(5), 533–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1

Giatman, M., Siswati, S., & Basri, I. Y. (2020). Online Learning Quality Control in the Pandemic Covid-19 Era in Indonesia. Journal of Nonformal Education, 6(2), 168–175.

Harisman, Y. (2021). Investigation of Student Behaviour in Mathematical Problem Solving. Infinity Journal, 10(2), 235-258.

Harisman, Y., Kusumah, Y. S., & Kusnandi, K. (2019). How Teacher Professionalism Influences Student Behaviour in Mathematical Problem-Solving Process. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012080

Harisman, Y., Kusumah, Y. S., & Kusnandi, K. (2018). Teachers’ Reflections on Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving in Junior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012011

Harisman, Y., Kusumah, Y. S., & Kusnandi, K. (2019). Beliefs of Junior High School Teachers on Learning Process on Mathematical Problem Solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032112

Harisman, Y., Kusumah, Y. S., & Kusnandi, K. (2019). The Attitude Of Senior High School Teachers On Mathematical Problem Solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012087

Heckel, C., & Ringeisen, T. (2019). Pride and Anxiety in Online Learning Environments: Achievement Emotions as Mediators Between Learners’ Characteristics and Learning Outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(5), 667–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12367

Hsiao, C. C., Huang, J. C. H., Huang, A. Y. Q., Lu, O. H. T., Yin, C. J., & Yang, S. J. H. (2019). Exploring the Effects of Online Learning Behaviors on Short-Term and Long-Term Learning Outcomes in Flipped Classrooms. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1522651

Lu, H., Jia, L., Gong, S. H., & Clark, B. (2007). The Relationship of Kolb learning Styles, Online Learning Behaviors and Learning Outcomes. Educational Technology and Society, 10(4), 187–196.

Marhami, M., Fonna, M., & Mursalin, M. (2020). The Effect of Video Conference Assisted Online Learning on Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability during the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 2(11), 947–951. https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v2i11.3317

Meiselwitz, G., & Sadera, W. A. (2008). Investigating the Connection Between Usability and Learning Outcomes in Online Learning Environments. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 234–242.

Mohajan, H. (2018). Properties of Transitions Observed in The161tb Decay. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(01), 23–48.

Muir, T., Beswick, K., & Williamson, J. (2008). I’m not Very Good at Solving Problems”: an Exploration of Students’ Problem-Solving Behaviours. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(3), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2008.04.003

Nurpratiwi, T. L., Dkk (2021). Students’ Thinking Processes in Solving Open-Ended Problems Using Online Learning Taking into Account the Mathematical Ability. Pi: Mathematics Education Journal. 4(1), 2–4.

Polya, G. (1957). How to Solve it (2nd ed.). USA: Princeton University Press.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1980). Heuristics in the Classroom. In S. Krulik & R. E. Reys (Eds.), Problem Solving in School Mathematics 1980 Yearbook (pp. 9–22). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Shadiq, F. (2015). Pentingnya Pemecahan Masalah. Yogyakarta: Widyaiswara PPPPTK Matematika.

Stake, R. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Xie, C., Jiang, L., Huang, G., Pu, H., Gong, B., Lin, H., Ma, S., Chen, X., Long, B., Si, G., Yu, H., Jiang, L., Yang, X., Shi, Y., & Yang, Z. (2020). Comparison of Different Samples for 2019 Novel Coronavirus Detection by Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 93, 264–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.02.050

Yin, R.K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Method (edisi ke-4). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Yoon, S. (2003). In search of meaningful online learning experiences. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2003(100), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.116




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v5i2.5423

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


##submission.copyrightStatement##

Laman JNPM: http://jnpm.ugj.ac.id

JNPM memiliki p-ISSN 2549-8495 | e-ISSN 2549-4937

JNPM is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 Internasional License.

execute(); ?>