REPRESENTASI MATEMATIS SEBAGAI MEDIATOR PEMBENTUKAN MAKNA

Authors

  • Sri Asnawati Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33603/e.v13i1.11835

Keywords:

mathematical representations, representational coordination, higher education, semiotics, systematic literature review

Abstract

Mathematical representations play a fundamental role in mathematics learning as they mediate meaning making, conceptual understanding, and students’ mathematical activity. In higher education, representations become increasingly critical due to the growing complexity of mathematical concepts and the need to coordinate symbolic, graphical, verbal, and visual forms. However, research indicates that university mathematics instruction often prioritises symbolic manipulation, leading students to experience difficulties in coordinating and transforming multiple representations. This article aims to systematically synthesise research on undergraduate students’ mathematical representations from a semiotic–representational perspective. A systematic literature review was conducted on Scopus-indexed journal articles published between 2014 and 2024. The findings reveal that mathematical representations function as primary epistemic mediators in learning mathematics, and that deep understanding depends on students’ ability to coordinate and translate across representations. The review also shows that the dominance of symbolic representations without meaningful integration of other forms tends to result in fragmented understanding. Based on this synthesis, the article highlights the need to position mathematical representations at the core of higher education mathematics instruction and proposes a conceptual framework that emphasises representational coordination as a foundation for mathematical meaning making.

References

Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001

Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024312321077

Bingolbali, E., Monaghan, J., & Roper, T. (2011). Engineering students’ conceptions of function. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9277-2

Bossé, M. J., Adu-Gyamfi, K., & Chandler, K. (2014). Students’ differentiated translation processes. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(6), 759–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2014.892652

Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z

Engelbrecht, J., Bergsten, C., & Kågesten, O. (2012). Conceptual and procedural approaches to mathematics in higher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9343-8

Goldin, G. A. (2008). Perspectives on representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 176–201). Routledge.

Goldin, G. A., & Shteingold, N. (2001). Systems of representations and the development of mathematical concepts. In A. Cuoco & F. Curcio (Eds.), The roles of representation in school mathematics (pp. 1–23). NCTM.

Kadunz, G., & Sträßer, R. (2015). Didactical obstacles and epistemological constraints. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 47(4), 583–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0698-z

Nardi, E., Biza, I., & Zachariades, T. (2019). Mathematical discourse in higher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 100(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9861-2

Presmeg, N. (2014). Representation and mathematics learning. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 521–525). Springer.

Radford, L. (2008). Semiotics in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9120-8

Radford, L., Edwards, L., & Arzarello, F. (2017). Beyond words and symbols. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9736-6

Selden, A., Selden, J., & Nardi, E. (2020). Norms and practices in undergraduate proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09948-9

Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2014). Developing students’ proof competencies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9507-5

Tall, D. (2013). How humans learn to think mathematically. Cambridge University Press.

Trigueros, M., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2016). Understanding functions in linear algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9671-6

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

Issue

Section

Artikel