The Value Relevance of Accounting Information on The Holdings of Cryptocurrencies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33603/jka.v10i1.10771Keywords:
Accounting information, Cryptocurrency, IFRS, Value relevanceAbstract
This study investigates the value relevance of accounting information for cryptocurrency holdings under the IFRS Interpretations Committee’s (IFRS IC) agenda decisions. It examines whether the classification of cryptocurrencies as intangible assets (IAS 38) or inventories (IAS 2) influences the decision-usefulness of accounting information in explaining share prices. The analysis is grounded in the Ohlson (1995) valuation model. Using a sample of IFRS reporters with holdings of cryptocurrency, this study employs regression analysis to test the association between share prices and key financial metrics, including book value of equity per share, earnings per share, and a dummy variable representing cryptocurrency classification. The results indicate that traditional accounting metrics book value of equity and earnings per share remain highly relevant in explaining share prices. However, the classification of cryptocurrency holdings under IAS 2 or IAS 38 does not significantly contribute to share price determination. This study extends the value relevance literature by focusing on the emerging asset class of cryptocurrencies.References
Anderson, C. M., Fang, V. W., Moon, J. R., & Shipman, J. E. (2026). Accounting for Cryptocurrencies*. Journal of Accounting Research, 64(1), 45–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.70018.
Ball, R., & Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6(AUTUMN), 159–178.
Barth, M. E. (2000). Valuation-based accounting research: Implications for financial reporting and opportunities for future research. Accounting and Finance, 40(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-629X.00033.
Barth, M. E. (2007). Standard-setting measurement issues and the relevance of research. Accounting and Business Research, 37(sup1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2007.9730079.
Barth, M. E. (2022). Accounting standards: the ‘too difficult’ box–the next big accounting issue? Accounting and Business Research, 52(5), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2022.2079757.
Barth, M. E., Beaver, W. H., & Landsman, W. R. (2001). The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: Another view. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 77–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00019-2.
Beaver, W. H. (1968). The information content of annual earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research, 6(SUPPL.), 67–92.
Beigman, E., Brennan, G., Hsieh, S. F., & Sannella, A. J. (2021). Dynamic Principal Market Determination: Fair Value Measurement of Cryptocurrency. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X211004134.
Bellucci, M., Cesa Bianchi, D., & Manetti, G. (2022). Blockchain in accounting practice and research: systematic literature review. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(7), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-10-2021-1477.
Bepari, M. K. (2015). Relative and incremental value relevance of book value and earnings during the global financial crisis. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 25(4), 531–556. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCoMA-11-2012-0072.
Blahušiaková, M. (2022). Accounting for Holdings of Cryptocurrencies in the Slovak Republic: Comparative Analysis. Contemporary Economics, 16(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.466.
Bratten, B., Causholli, M., & Khan, U. (2016). Usefulness of fair values for predicting banks’ future earnings: evidence from other comprehensive income and its components. Review of Accounting Studies, 21(1), 280–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-015-9346-7.
Chou, J. H., Agrawal, P., & Birt, J. (2022). Accounting for crypto-assets: stakeholders’ perceptions. Studies in Economics and Finance, 39(3), 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-10-2021-0469.
CoinMarketCap. (2022). Total Cryptocurrency Market Cap. https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/.
Cortesi, A., & Vena, L. (2019). Disclosure quality under Integrated Reporting: A value relevance approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, 745–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.155.
Dechow, P. M., & Ge, W. (2006). The persistence of earnings and cash flows and the role of special items: Implications for the accrual anomaly. Review of Accounting Studies, 11(2–3), 253–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-006-9004-1.
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486.
Hampl, F., & Gyönyörová, L. (2021). Can Fiat-backed Stablecoins Be Considered Cash or Cash Equivalents Under International Financial Reporting Standards Rules? Australian Accounting Review, 31(3), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12344.
Hileman, G., & Rauchs, M. (2017). Global Cryptocurrency Benchmarking Study. Global Cryptocurrency Benchmarking Study.
Ho, L.-C., Liu, C.-S., & Sohn, P. (2001). The value relevance of accounting information around the 1997 Asian financial crisis - The case of South Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 8(2), 83–107.
Holthausen, R. W., & Watts, R. L. (2001). The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 3–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00029-5.
Holub, M., & Johnson, J. (2018). Bitcoin research across disciplines. Information Society, 34(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1414094.
IFRS Staff Paper. (2018a). Holdings of cryptocurrencies (Agenda-4A; Cryptocurrencies).
IFRS Staff Paper. (2018b). Possible standard-setting—holdings of cryptocurrencies (Agenda-4B; Cryptocurrencies).
IFRS Staff Paper. (2019a). Agenda decision to finalise (Agenda-12; Holdings of Cryptocurrencies).
IFRS Staff Paper. (2019b). Comment letters (Agenda-12A; Holdings of Cryptocurrencies).
Landsman, W. (1986). An empirical investigation of pension fund property rights. The Accounting Review, 61(4), 662–691.
Lazea, G.-I., Bunget, O.-C., & Lungu, C. (2024). Cryptocurrencies’ Impact on Accounting: Bibliometric Review. Risks, 12(6), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12060094.
Luo, M., & Yu, S. (2024). Financial reporting for cryptocurrency. Review of Accounting Studies, 29(2), 1707–1740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09741-w.
Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48(3), 261–297.
Morozova, T., Akhmadeev, R., Lehoux, L., Yumashev, A., Meshkova, G., & Lukiyanova, M. (2020). Crypto asset assessment models in financial reporting content typologies. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(3), 2196–2212. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(49).
Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00461.x.
Pelucio-Grecco, M. C., dos Santos Neto, J. P., & Constancio, D. (2020). Accounting for bitcoins in light of IFRS and tax aspects. Revista Contabilidade e Financas, 31(83), 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201909110.
Permatasari, I., & Narsa, I. M. (2022). Sustainability reporting or integrated reporting: which one is valuable for investors? Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 18(5), 666–684. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-12-2020-0204.
Procházka, D. (2018). Accounting for bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies under IFRS: A comparison and assessment of competing models. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 18, 161–188. https://doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-v18_7.
Procházka, D. (2019). Is Bitcoin a Currency or an Investment? An IFRS View. In Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11851-8_21.
Raiborn, C., & Sivitanides, M. (2015). Accounting Issues Related to Bitcoins. Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, 26(2), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22016.
Ram, A. J. (2019). Bitcoin as a new asset class. Meditari Accountancy Research, 27(1), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-11-2017-0241.
Ram, A., Maroun, W., & Garnett, R. (2016). Accounting for the Bitcoin: Accountability, neoliberalism and a correspondence analysis. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(1), 2–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-07-2015-0035.
Ramassa, P., & Leoni, G. (2022). Standard setting in times of technological change: accounting for cryptocurrency holdings. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 35(7), 1598–1624. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2020-4968.
Tan, B. S., & Low, K. Y. (2017). Bitcoin – Its Economics for Financial Reporting. Australian Accounting Review, 27(2), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12167.
Tan, B. S., & Low, K. Y. (2019). Blockchain as the Database Engine in the Accounting System. Australian Accounting Review, 29(2), 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12278.
White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838.
Yan, H., Yan, K., & Gupta, R. (2022). A Survey of the Accounting Industry on Holdings of Cryptocurrencies in Xiamen City, China. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15040175.
Yen, J. C., & Wang, T. (2021). Stock price relevance of voluntary disclosures about blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 40, 100499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2021.100499.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.