PENGARUH DISIPLIN KERJA DAN MOTIVASI TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI PADA LINGKUNGAN ASISTEN PEMERINTAHAN DAN KESEJAHTERAAN RAKYAT DI SEKRETARIAT DAERAH KOTA CIREBON

Yanto Heriyanto

Sari


ABSTRACT

 

The title of this study is "The Effect of Motivation and Discipline Working on Employee Performance in Government Assisted Environment and Social Welfare Secretariat in Cirebon. Study aims to analyze (1) the effect of work motivation and discipline on employee performance and Welfare Administration Assistant in the Regional Secretariat Cirebon, (2) the effect of motivation on employee performance and Welfare Administration Assistant at Regional Secretariat Cirebon, and (3) the effect of labor discipline on employee performance and Welfare Administration Assistant at Regional Secretariat Cirebon.

The research method used is descriptive explanative (explanatory descriptive) and that the sample in this study is the staff of the Assistant Government and Social Welfare Regional Secretariat Cirebon. The collection of primary data obtained through interviews and questionnaires using questionnaires, and secondary data obtained from the agency that has to do with the study. The resulting data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and, using path analysis (Path analysis).

The results showed that: (1) motivation and discipline together significantly affect employee performance and Welfare Administration Assistant Regional Secretariat Cirebon. The results obtained hypothesized path coefficients motivation affects employee performance by 13,00%, the coefficient of labor discipline pathways affect the performance of employees at 34,10%, or the influence of motivation and work discipline cumulative effect on employee performance by 47,10%. That is the kind of motivation and discipline of work, the better the performance of employees in performing their duties and functions, (2) significant motivation on employee performance and Welfare Administration Assistant Regional Secretariat Cirebon.

The results obtained path coefficients motivation hypothesis directly affect the performance of employees by 6.30% and an indirect relationship of 6,70%, thus determining the total motivation employee performance by 13,00%. This means that the better the motivation, the better the performance of employees in performing their duties and functions, and (3) labor discipline significantly affect employee performance and Welfare Administration Assistant Regional Secretariat Cirebon. The results obtained path coefficients discipline hypothesis directly affect the work performance of employees amounted to 27.40% and indirect relationships by 6.70%, so the total variable labor discipline determines employee performance by 34,10%. That is the kind of employee discipline, the better the performance of the employee in carrying out its duties and functions.


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Alex S. Nitisemito. 1990. Manajemen Personalia Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Al-Rasid, Harun. 1994. Analisis Jalur (Path Analysis) sebagai Sarana Statistika dalam Analisis Kausal. Bandung: LP3ES Fakultas Ekonomi UNPAD.

Atmosudirdjo. 1992. Administrasi dan Manajemen. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Azhar, Arsyad. 2002. Pokok-pokok Manajemen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Dharma, Agus. 1998. Manajemen Prestasi Kerja. Jakarta: Rajawali.

Dwiyanto, A. 1995. Penilaian Kinerja Organisasi Publik. Yogyakarta: Fisipol Universitas Gajah Mada.

Gomes, Faustino Cardoso. 2000. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Heidjachman dan Husnan, S. 2003. Manajemen Personalia. Yogjakarta: BPFE.

Hernowo Narmodo dan M. Farid Wajdi. 2005. Pengaruh Motivasi dan Disiplin terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Badan Kepegawaian Daerah Kabupaten Wonogiri.

Heri Adianto. Yuke Agustin dan Happy Triandira. 2009. Pengaruh Spesialis Pekerjaaan dan Kepuasan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Hicks, Herbert G dan Gullet, G Ray. 1987. Organisasi Teori dan Tingkah Laku. Diterjemahkan oleh G. Kartasapoetra. Jakarta: Penerbit Bumi Aksara

Lembaga Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia. 1999. Pengukuran Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. Jakarta: Badan Pengawasan dan Pembangunan.

Mangkunegara, A.P. 2006. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mar'at. 1993. Pemimpin dan Kepemimpinan. Ghalia Indonesia: Jakarta.

Moenir, A.S. 1993. Pendekatan Manusiawi dan Organisasi Dalam Pembinaan Kepegawaian. Jakarta: Gunung Agung.

Ndraha, Taliziduhu. 2000. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Putra, Fadillah. 2001. Paradigma Kritis dalam Studi Kebijakan Publik, Perubahan dan Inovasi Kebijakan dan Ruang Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Proses Kebijakan Publik. Surabaya: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rivai, Veithzal. 2004. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan dari Teori ke Praktik. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Ronni Yudianto (2008). Pengaruh Kepuasan dan Motivasi Guru terhadap Kinerja Guru SMK Pangudi Luhur Tarcisius Semarang. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Sedarmayanti. 2007. Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia. Reformasi Birokrasi dan Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Siagian, Sondang P. 2004. Organisasi Kepemimpinan dan Perilaku Administrasi. Jakarta: PT. Gunung Agung.

Silalahi. 2007. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Sugiyono. 2002. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Winardi, J. 2000. Motivasi dan Pemotivasian, dalam Manajemen. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Wirawan, 2008. Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Wiryo Surachmad. 1993. Pengantar Penelitian Ilmiah Dasar Metode Teknik. Bandung: Tarsito.

Yoyok Soesatyo. 2005. Pengaruh Motivasi dan Disiplin Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT. H.M. Sampoerna Tbk. Surabaya. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/publika.v4i1.1508

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 International License
execute(); ?>