Examining The Determinants of AI Misuse Among Students in Indonesia: An Analysis Through The Fraud Diamond Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33603/jka.v9i1.10442Kata Kunci:
Kecerdasan buatan, Kecurangan akademis, Mahasiswa bisnis dan akuntansi, Teori fraud diamondAbstrak
Peningkatan integrasi kecerdasan buatan dalam dunia akademik menimbulkan kekhawatiran etis, khususnya di kalangan mahasiswa bisnis dan akuntansi yang diharapkan menjunjung tinggi integritas profesional. Penelitian ini mengkaji faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi penggunaan AI untuk melakukan kecurangan akademik di kalangan mahasiswa bisnis di Indonesia, dengan menggunakan Fraud Diamond Theory sebagai kerangka konseptual. Survei daring yang dilakukan sejak Agustus 2024 hingga Januari 2025 menghasilkan 424 tanggapan valid yang dianalisis menggunakan SmartPLS versi 4.1.0.9. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mahasiswa tidak memandang faktor peluang sebagai penentu dalam melakukan kecurangan akademik berbantuan AI. Sebaliknya, faktor kapabilitas, rasionalisasi, dan motivasi berpengaruh signifikan terhadap niat mahasiswa untuk melakukan tindakan tersebut. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi bagi literatur dan praktik dengan menyoroti tantangan etika dalam adopsi AI di lingkungan pendidikan di Indonesia. Studi ini menekankan pentingnya pelatihan etika dalam penggunaan AI, peningkatan literasi digital, serta penerapan protokol institusional yang jelas dalam menghadapi dilema etis. Pemahaman terhadap faktor-faktor utama kecurangan akademik berbantuan AI mendukung pengembangan strategi pencegahan dan deteksi yang efektif. Mengingat fokus penelitian pada mahasiswa bisnis dan akuntansi di Indonesia, diperlukan validasi lebih luas dengan sampel beragam dan pengukuran yang lebih objektif. Penelitian selanjutnya diharapkan dapat mengeksplorasi dampak jangka panjang penggunaan AI terhadap etika profesional, integritas akademik, dan efektivitas intervensi.
Referensi
Ababneh, K. I., Ahmed, K., & Dedousis, E. (2022). Predictors of Cheating in Online Exams among Business Students during The Covid Pandemic: Testing the Theory of Planned Behavior. International Journal of Management Education, 20(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100713.
Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., Lohmann, S., & Albarracín, D. (2018). The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior. In The Handbook of Attitudes Volume 1: Basic Principles (pp. 187–236). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410612823-13.
Alshurafat, H., Al Shbail, M. O., Hamdan, A., Al-Dmour, A., & Ensour, W. (2024). Factors Affecting Accounting Students’ Misuse of Chatgpt: an Application of The Fraud Triangle Theory. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 22(2), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-04-2023-0182.
Almasri, F. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Teaching and Learning of Science: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research. Research in Science Education, 54(5), 977–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10176-3.
Ampuni, S., Kautsari, N., Maharani, M., Kuswardani, S., & Buwono, S. B. S. (2020). Academic Dishonesty in Indonesian College Students: an Investigation from a Moral Psychology Perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(4), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09352-2.
Arefin, M. S., Hoque, M. R., & Bao, Y. (2015). The Impact of Business Intelligence on Organization’s Effectiveness: An Empirical Study. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 17(3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsit-09-2014-0067.
Arkorful, V. E., Lugu, B. K., Arkorful, V. A., & Charway, S. M. (2022). Probing the Predictors of Fraud Using the Fraud Diamond Theory: An Empirical Evidence from Local Governments in Ghana. Forum for Development Studies, 49(2), 291–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2022.2080759.
Atmini, S., Jusoh, R., Prastiwi, A., Wahyudi, S. T., Hardanti, K. N., & Widiarti, N. N. (2024). Plagiarism among Accounting and Business Postgraduate Students: A Fraud Diamond Framework Moderated by Understanding of Artificial Intelligence. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2375077.
Avortri, C., & Agbanyo, R. (2021). Determinants of Management Fraud in The Banking Sector of Ghana: The Perspective of The Diamond Fraud Theory. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(1), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-06-2020-0102.
Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. (2024). Jumlah Penduduk Menurut Provinsi di Indonesia (Ribu Jiwa), 2024. Badan Pusat Statistik Sulawesi Utara. Retrieved January 22, 2025, from https://sulut.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/OTU4IzI=/jumlah-penduduk-menurut-provinsi-diindonesia.html.
BestColleges. (2023). Half of College Students Say Using AI Is Cheating | BestColleges. BestColleges. https://www.bestcolleges.com/research/college-students-ai-tools-survey/.
Bierstaker, J., Brink, W. D., Khatoon, S., & Thorne, L. (2024). Academic Fraud and Remote Evaluation of Accounting Students: An Application of the Fraud Triangle. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05628-9.
Bilen, E., & Matros, A. (2021). Online Cheating amid COVID-19. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 182, 196–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.12.004.
Bujaki, M., Lento, C., & Sayed, N. (2019). Utilizing Professional Accounting Concepts to Understand and Respond to Academic Dishonesty in Accounting Programs. Journal of Accounting Education, 47, 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2019.01.001.
Cheng, C., & Crumbley, D. L. (2018). Student and Professor Use of Publisher Test Banks and Implications for Fair Play. Journal of Accounting Education, 42, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2017.12.001.
Choi, J. H., Hickman, K. E., Monahan, A. B., & Schwarcz, D. (2022). ChatGPT Goes to Law School. Journal of Legal Education, 71(3), 387–400.
Choo, F., & Tan, K. (2008). The Effect of Fraud Triangle Factors on Students’ Cheating Behaviors. In Advances in Accounting Education (Vol. 2, p. 205– 220). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1085-4622(08)09009-3.
Dendir, S., & Maxwell, R. S. (2020). Cheating in Online Courses: Evidence from Online Proctoring. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100033.
Dias-Oliveira, E., Morais, C., Pasion, R., & Hodgson, J. (2024). “It Is No Big Deal!”: Fraud Diamond Theory as an Explanatory Model for Understanding Students’ Academic Fraudulent Behavior. Sage Open, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241266091.
Ferguson, S. L., Flostrand, A., Lam, J., & Pitt, L. (2022). Caught in a Vicious Cycle? Student Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty in The Business Classroom. International Journal of Management Education, 20(3), 100677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100677.
Firdaus, R., Xue, Y., Gang, L., & Sibt e Ali, M. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Human Psychology in Online Transaction Fraud. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(October), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.947234.
Fransiska, I. S., & Utami, H. (2019). Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa: Perspektif Fraud Diamond Theory. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 6(2), 316–323. https://doi.org/10.17977/um004v6i22019p316.
Hosseini, M., Rasmussen, L. M., & Resnik, D. B. (2023). Using AI to Write Scholarly Publications. Accountability in Research, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2168535.
Hughes, J. C., & Eaton, S. E. (2022). Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: Beyond Student Cheating. In Academic Integrity in Canada: An Enduring and Essential Challenge (Vol. 1, pp. 81–102). Springer.
Hutton, P. A. (2006). Understanding Student Cheating and What Educators can do About it. College Teaching, 54(1), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.54.1.171-176.
Jang-Jaccard, J., & Nepal, S. (2014). A Survey of Emerging Threats in Cybersecurity. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 80(5), 973–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2014.02.005.
Jones, D. L. R. (2011). Academic Dishonesty: Are More Students Cheating? Business Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569911404059.
Kazemian, S., Said, J., Hady Nia, E., & Vakilifard, H. (2019). Examining fraud risk factors on asset misappropriation: evidence from the Iranian banking industry. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(2), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-01-2018-0008.
Khamainy, A. H., Ali, M., & Setiawan, M. A. (2022). Detecting Financial Statement Fraud through New Fraud Diamond Model: The Case of Indonesia. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(3), 925–941. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-06-2021-0118.
Hair, Jr, J. F., Page, M., & Brunsveld, N. (2020). Essentials of Business Research Methods. In Essentials of Business Research Methods (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315704562.
IAESB. (2019). Handbook of International Education Pronouncements. In International Federation of Accountants. International Federation of Accountants.
Kock, N., & Davison, R. (2003). Dealing with Plagiarism in the Information Systems Research Community: A Look at Factors That Drive Plagiarism and Ways to Address Them. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 511–532. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036547.
Krou, M. R., Fong, C. J., & Hoff, M. A. (2020). Achievement Motivation and Academic Dishonesty: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. Educational Psychology Review (Vols. 33–427, pp. 427–458). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09557-7.
Liang, H. L., Yeh, T. K., & Wang, C. H. (2022). Compulsory Citizenship Behavior and Its Outcomes: Two Mediation Models. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(February), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.766952.
McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate Business Programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5(3), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2006.22697018.
McIntire, A., Calvert, I., & Ashcraft, J. (2024). Pressure to Plagiarize and the Choice to Cheat: Toward a Pragmatic Reframing of the Ethics of Academic Integrity. Education Sciences, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030244.
Mulisa, F., & Ebessa, A. D. (2021). The Carryover Effects of College Dishonesty on The Professional Workplace Dishonest Behaviors: A Systematic Review. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1935408.
Nath, L., & Lovaglia, M. (2009). Cheating on Multiplechoice Exams: Monitoring, Assessment, and an Optional Assignment. College Teaching, 57(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.57.1.3-8.
Nguyen, H. M., & Goto, D. (2024). Unmasking Academic Cheating Behavior in the Artificial Intelligence Era: Evidence from Vietnamese Undergraduates. Education and Information Technologies, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12495-4.
Ofem, U. J., Owan, V. J., Iyam, M. A., Udeh, M. I., Anake, P. M., & Ovat, S. V. (2024). Students’ Perceptions, Attitudes and Utilisation of ChatGPT for Academic Dishonesty: Multigroup Analyses via PLS‒SEM. Education and Information Technologies, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12850-5.
Omukaga, K. O. (2020a). Is the Fraud Diamond Perspective Valid in Kenya? Journal of Financial Crime, 28(3), 810–840. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2019-0141.
Parks-Leduc, L., Guay, R. P., & Mulligan, L. M. (2022). The Relationships between Personal Values, Justifications, and Academic Cheating for Business vs. Non-Business Students. Journal of Academic Ethics, 20(4), 499–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09427-z.
Playfoot, D., Quigley, M., & Thomas, A. G. (2024). Hey ChatGPT, Give Me A Title for A Paper about Degree Apathy and Student Use of AI for Assignment Writing. Internet and Higher Education, 62(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100950.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych120710-100452.
Ramamoorti, S. (2008). The Psychology and Sociology of Fraud: Integrating the Behavioral Sciences Component into Fraud and Forensic Accounting Curricula. Issues in Accounting Education, 23(4), 521–533. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2008.23.4.52.
Ratmono, D., & Frendy. (2022). Examining the Fraud Diamond Theory through Ethical Culture Variables: A Study of Regional Development Banks in Indonesia. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.211716.
Razia, B., Awwad, B., & Taqi, N. (2022). The Relationship between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Its Aspects in Higher Education. Development in Learning Organizations, 37(3), 21–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo-04-2022-0074.
Rong, H., & Chun, C. (2024). Digital Education Council Global AI Student Survey 2024. Digital Education Council.
Said, J., Alam, M. M., Karim, Z. A., & Johari, R. J. (2018). Integrating Religiosity into Fraud Triangle Theory: Findings on Malaysian Police Officers. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 4(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-09-2017-0027.
Said, J., Alam, M. M., Ramli, M., & Rafidi, M. (2017). Integrating Ethical Values into Fraud Triangle Theory in Assessing Employee Fraud: Evidence from the Malaysian Banking Industry. Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-2/13.
Sallam, M., Salim, N. A., Barakat, M., Al-Mahzoum, K., Al-Tammemi, A. B., Malaeb, D., Hallit, R., & Hallit, S. (2023). Assessing Health Students’ Attitudes and Usage of ChatGPT in Jordan: Validation Study. JMIR Medical Education, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2196/48254.
Sajja, R., Sermet, Y., Cikmaz, M., Cwiertny, D., & Demir, I. (2024). Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Intelligent Assistant for Personalized and Adaptive Learning in Higher Education. Information, 15(10), 596. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15100596.
Serhan, O. A., Houjeir, R., & Aldhaheri, M. (2022). Academic Dishonesty and the Diamond Fraud: Attitudes of UAE Undergraduate Business Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 21(10), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.10.5.
Scharth, M. (2022). The ChatGPT Chatbot is Blowing People Away with Its Writing Skills. An Expert Explains Why It’s So Impressive. The Conversation. Retrieved January 31, 2025, from https://theconversation.com/the-chatgpt-chatbot-is-blowing-people-away-with-its-writing-skills-an-expert-explains-why-its-so-impressive-195908.
Sharma, R., Mehta, K., & Vyas, V. (2024). Investigating Academic Dishonesty among Business School Students using Fraud Triangle Theory and Role of Technology. Journal of Education for Business, 99(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2023.2260925.
Sholikhah, Z., Adawiyah, W. R., Pramuka, B. A., & Pariyanti, E. (2024). Can Spiritual Power Reduce Online Cheating Behavior among University Students? The Fraud Triangle Theory Perspective. Journal of International Education in Business, 17(1), 82–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-11-2022-0082.
Smith, K., Emerson, D., Haight, T., & Wood, B. (2023). An Examination of Online Cheating Among Business Students through The Lens of the Dark Triad and Fraud Diamond. Ethics and Behavior, 33(6), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2022.2104281.
Smith, K. J., Emerson, D. J., & Mauldin, S. (2021). Online Cheating at the Intersection of the Dark Triad and Fraud Diamond. Journal of Accounting Education, 57, 100753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100753.
Speklé, R. F., & Widener, S. K. (2018). Challenging issues in survey research: Discussion and suggestions. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(2), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51860.
Sweeney, S. (2023). Who Wrote This? Essay Mills and Assessment – Considerations Regarding Contract Cheating and AI in Higher Education. International Journal of Management Education, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100818.
Tareq, A., Mahfug, A. Al, Faisal, M. I., Mahmud, T. Al, Khan, R., & Momen, S. (2023). Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Based Models for the Diagnosis of Chronic Diseases. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems: Vol. 724 LNNS (pp. 597–626). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35314-7_52.
Tauginienė, L., Gaižauskaitė, I., Glendinning, I., Kravjar, J., Ojsteršek, M., Ribeiro, L., Tatjana, O., Marino, F., Cosentino, M., & Sivasubramaniam, S. (2018). Glossary for Academic Integrity in Greek: ENAI report.
Tepper, B. J. (2010). When Managers Pressure Employees to Behave Badly: Toward a Comprehensive Response. Business Horizons, 53(6), 591–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2010.07.002.
Trompeter, G. M., Carpenter, T. D., Desai, N., Jones, K. L., & Riley, R. A. (2013). A Synthesis of Fraud-related Research. Auditing : A Journal of Practice and Theory, 32(SUPPL.1), 287–321. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50360.
Utami, I., Wijono, S., Noviyanti, S., & Mohamed, N. (2019). Fraud Diamond, Machiavellianism and Fraud Intention. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 35(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-02-2019-0042.
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing Theory of Fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128.
Walker, J. (2010). Measuring Plagiarism: Researching What Students Do, Not What They Say They Do. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902912994.
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–41.
Yoo, Y., & Alavi, M. (2001). Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influences on Social Pretense, Task Participation, and Group Consensus. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 371–390. https://doi-org.ezproxy4.library.arizona.edu/10.2307/3250922.
Yulita, I. N., Hariz, F. A., Suryana, I., & Prabuwono, A. S. (2023). Educational Innovation Faced with COVID-19: Deep Learning for Online Exam Cheating Detection. Education Sciences, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020194.
Zayed, H. (2023). ‘We are Not Cheating. We are Helping Each Other Out:’ Digital Collective Cheating in Secondary Education. Learning, Media and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2222621.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.