MANAGING INTERPERSONAL MEANING IN SOCIAL MEDIA: A CASE STUDY OF INDONESIAN LANGUAGE USE

Putu Nur Ayomi

Abstract


Social media has become an important platform for everyone to broadcast information, opinions, and emotion freely and borderless in today's society. Among other social media, Twitter is the most well-known social media platform for idea-sharing. With a resource such as hashtags, people can search, follow, and contribute to a specific topic, which can create a nationwide and even worldwide discussion. With such a high engagement between users, how the twitter users use language to manage interpersonal role-relationship effectively will determine how smooth a communication goes. Character education is an integral part of Indonesia's education system.  Therefore, in this internet era, it is also essential to understand the language resources of interpersonal meaning that students can exploit to engage more positively while exercising their freedom of expression in social media. This study draws upon the Systemic Functional Linguistic's (SFL) theory of interpersonal metafunction (Halliday, 1978; Halliday & Matthiessen, 2014; Martin, 1992) that focuses on Mood and Modality and  the Appraisal system (Martin, J.R.; White, 2005). As a case study, the data are taken from a trending topic in Indonesia Twitter, by choosing purposively some data that can best reflect the variety of interpersonal meaningThis study shows that specific interpersonal language resources can produce a more negotiated stance and solidarity that can lessen personal conflicts between users and encourage more positive communication.


Keywords


appraisal, modality, mood, SFL

Full Text:

PDF

References


Article 19. (2003). Navigating Indonesia’s Information Highway. https://www.article19.org/data/files/Indonesia_Report_ENGLISH.pdf

Ayomi, P. N., & Candra, K. D. P. (2016). Genre dalam Buku Teks Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Inggris di Sekolah dasar: Pendekatan Linguistik Fungsional Sistemik. International Seminar PRASASTI III: Current Research in Linguistics, 614–619. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/pras.v0i0.1626

Ayomi, P. N., Dreyfus, S., Hadi, S., & Sutrisno, A. (2020). The Research is Conducted…’: An Exploration of a Grammatical Metaphor Syndrome in Indonesian Research Articles. Lingua Cultura, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v14i1.6342

Fatia, S. N. (2020). Ditandatangani Lebih dari 52.000 Orang, Petisi Bebaskan Jerinx SID Muncul usai 1 Hari Penahanannya. Pikiran Rakyat. https://www.pikiran-rakyat.com/entertainment/pr-01666345/ditandatangani-lebih-dari-52000-orang-petisi-bebaskan-jerinx-sid-muncul-usai-1-hari-penahanannya

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. (2014). An introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Edward Arnold.

Humprey, S., Droga, L., & Feez, S. (2012). Grammar and Meaning. PETAA.

ICRS. (2020). The Trend of Blasphemy in Indonesia. https://www.icrs.or.id/news/the-trend-of-blasphemy-in-indonesia

K, E. R. (2015). Kesantunan Pengungkapan Kalimat Perintah dalam Perkuliahan Bahasa Indonesia Mahasiswa Sekolah Tinggi Bahasa Islam (STAI). DIALEKTIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 2(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15408/dialektika.v2i1.2198

Korenek, P., & Šimko, M. (2014). Sentiment analysis on microblog utilizing appraisal theory. World Wide Web, 17(4), 847–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-013-0247-z

Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: system and structure. John Benjamins.

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.

Ross, A. S., & Caldwell, D. (2020). ‘Going negative’: An APPRAISAL analysis of the rhetoric of Donald Trump on Twitter. Language & Communication, 70, 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.09.003

Yu, H., & Wu, C. (2016). Recreating the image of Chan master Huineng: the roles of MOOD and MODALITY. Functional Linguistics, 3(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-016-0027-z

Zappavigna, M. (2011). Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society, 13(5), 788–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385097




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/perspective.v9i1.4544

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
execute(); ?>