KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS MAHASISWA: SLR DALAM PERSPEKTIF EPISTEMIK DAN DISKURSIF

Authors

  • Cita Dwi Rosita Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
  • Irmawati Liliana Kusuma Dewi Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
  • Asep Amam Universitas Galuh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33603/e.v13i1.11833

Keywords:

mathematical reasoning; mathematical communication; epistemic practices; mathematical discourse; higher education

Abstract

Mathematical reasoning and mathematical communication are two fundamental dimensions of learning mathematics in higher education that are often investigated separately. This article aims to reconceptualize their relationship through an epistemic–discursive perspective, viewing reasoning and communication as mutually constitutive practices in undergraduate students’ mathematical activity. The study employs a systematic literature review of articles published in internationally reputable journals over the last decade that address mathematical reasoning, communication, argumentation, and discourse in higher education contexts. The synthesis was conducted using thematic synthesis enriched by theoretical analysis. The findings indicate that mathematical reasoning cannot be fully understood without considering the communicative dimension and the discursive norms that mediate it, while mathematical communication functions as a medium of thinking and meaning-making rather than merely a means of expression. Based on these findings, the article proposes an integrative conceptual framework that positions mathematical argumentation and epistemic norms as central mediators between students’ reasoning and communication. This study contributes theoretically by offering a reconceptualization of reasoning and communication that is relevant for research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics education.

Author Biography

Cita Dwi Rosita, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

Link Scopus ID

Link Sinta ID

Prodi Pendidikan Matematika

References

Arcavi, A., Drijvers, P., & Stacey, K. (2017). The learning and teaching of algebra: Ideas, insights, and activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(3), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9720-1

Biza, I., & Nardi, E. (2016). Discursive resources and participation in undergraduate mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9672-5

Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31(3–4), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1996.9653265

Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z

Dreyfus, T. (1999). Why Johnny can’t prove. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1–3), 85–109.

Engelbrecht, J., Bergsten, C., & Kågesten, O. (2012). Conceptual and procedural approaches to mathematics in higher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9343-8

Hanna, G. (2000). Proof, explanation and exploration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1–2), 5–23.

Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2007). Toward comprehensive perspectives on the learning and teaching of proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 1–5.

Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Steele, M. D., & Cirillo, M. (2017). Discourse in mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.1.0005

Henriksen, E. K., Dillon, J., & Ryder, J. (2016). Understanding student participation. Science Education, 100(4), 631–655.

Herbst, P., & Kosko, K. (2016). Mathematical communication and the negotiation of norms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(3), 395–415.

Inglis, M., & Alcock, L. (2012). Expert and novice approaches to proof comprehension. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(4), 358–390.

Inglis, M., Mejía-Ramos, J. P., & Simpson, A. (2018). Epistemic beliefs and proof comprehension. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98(3), 299–318.

Inglis, M., & Simpson, A. (2020). Reasoning, explanation, and proof in university mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104(1), 1–21.

Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276.

Lithner, J., Jonsson, B., & Norqvist, M. (2018). Mathematical reasoning and task design. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(2), 145–164.

Morgan, C. (1998). Writing mathematically: The discourse of investigation. Falmer Press.

Nardi, E., Biza, I., & Zachariades, T. (2019). Mathematical discourse in higher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 100(2), 157–175.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.

Oner, D., & Adadan, E. (2015). Use of multimodal representations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(3), 343–365.

Pedemonte, B. (2007). Argumentation and proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 23–41.

Pedemonte, B. (2016). Argumentation and proof in mathematics education. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 48(1–2), 15–26.

Rasmussen, C., Zandieh, M., King, K., & Wawro, M. (2016). Advancing reasoning and communication. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 42, 1–15.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2015). Why aren’t we measuring what we value? Educational Researcher, 44(8), 491–497.

Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2003). Validations of proofs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(2), 155–179.

Selden, A., Selden, J., & Nardi, E. (2020). Norms and practices in undergraduate proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104(2), 123–141.

Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating. Cambridge University Press.

Sfard, A., & Kieran, C. (2001). Cognition as communication. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1–3), 1–14.

Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2014). Developing students’ proof competencies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(3), 307–331.

Stylianides, A. J., Weber, K., & Leyva, L. (2017). Argumentation in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(3), 341–359.

Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument (Updated ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Wawro, M., Rasmussen, C., Zandieh, M., Sweeney, G., & Larson, C. (2017). Inquiry-oriented instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95(1), 1–20.

Wawro, M., & Hatfield, N. (2018). Discourse practices in undergraduate mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51, 1–15.

Weber, K. (2010). Mathematics majors’ perceptions of proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 115–145.

Weber, K., Inglis, M., & Mejía-Ramos, J. P. (2015). Students’ reasoning and proof practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 90(3), 329–347.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

Issue

Section

Artikel