Analisis Keterampilan Metakognitif Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas dalam Pembelajaran Ekonomi Abad 21 di Indonesia

Kodri Kodri, Aan Anisah

Sari


Abstract

This study aims to describe the students metacognitive thinking skills in 21st century economic learning in Indonesia. This research is an explanatory survey research with data collection techniques through questionnaire distribution to students. The population in this study were all students of class X and XI of UPI Pilot Laboratory Senior High School as many as 464 people. The sample was taken using the Slovin formula because the total population is less than 1000 people with an error limit of 10% so that a sample of 80 students is obtained. The data of metacognitive thinking skills that have been obtained were analyzed by making a comparable standard measure with the criterion scores of all the indicators summarized in 52 statements that researchers have distributed and distributed to respondents. The results of this study indicate that students metacognitive thinking skills in economic learning as a whole are high, but when viewed from eight indicators that indicators of procedural knowledge and improvement are still relatively low. Therefore, we need a way to develop both indicators.

Keywords: Metacognitive Thinking Skills, Senior High School, 21st Century Economic Learning.


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Abdullah, R., & Soemantri, D. (2018). Validation of Metacognitive Awareness Inventory in Academic Stage of Undergraduate Medical Education. eJournal Kedokteran Indonesia.

Alfiah, A. N., Putra, N. M. D., & Subali, B. (2018). Media Scrapbook Sebagai Jurnal Refleksi untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif dan Regulasi Diri. Jurnal Pendidikan (Teori dan Praktik), 3(1), 57-67.

Anderson, O.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). “A Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching, and Assessing (A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives)â€. New York: Addision Wesley Longman, Inc.

Amir, M. F. (2018). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Kontekstual untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Metakognisi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Journal of Medives: Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 2(1), 117-128.

Efrilla, G., Amnah, S., & Suryanti, E. (2018). Profil Kesadaran dan Strategi Metakognisi Siswa SMP Negeri SeLecamatan Kampar. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 1(1).

In’am, Akhsanul. 2009. “Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran Melalui Lesson Study Berbasis Metakognitifâ€. Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(1), 130.

Irham, M. (2018, March). Analisis Metakognisi Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Pada Materi Turunan. In PROCEEDINGS ELPSA CONFERENCE 2017 (Vol. 1, No. 1).

Iskandar, S.M. 2016. Pendekatan Keterampilan Metakognitif dalam Pembelajaran Sains di Kelas. ERUDIO (Journal of Educational Innovation) 2(2), 13-20.

Jonassen, D.H. 2004. Learning to Solve Problems: an Instructional Design Guide. San Francisco: Joh Willey & Sons.

Khotimah, K. (2018). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematis dengan Pendekatan Metacognitive Guidance Berbantuan GEOGEBRA. GAUSS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 53-65

Livingstone, Jennifer A. (2003). Metacognition: An Overview. Eric Clearinghouse on Assesment and Evaluation: College Park Maryland.

Narang, Divya, dkk. (2013). Metacognition and Academic Performance of Rural Adolescents. 7 (3). hlm 167.

J.B Hauturuk, Agusmanto. (2016). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. Universitas Unswagati: Cirebon.

Nurmaliah, C. (2009). Analisis keterampilan metakognisi siswa SMP Negeri di Kota Malang berdasarkan kemampuan awal, tingkat kelas, dan jenis kelamin. Jurnal Biologi Edukasi, 1(2), 18-21.

Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Leraning, Teaching, and Assesing, Theory and Practict. College Education. 41 (1): 219 – 225.

Ramadhan, M. R. (2018). Tingkat metakognitif siswa dalam pembelajaran pendidikan agama Islam berbasis masalah: studi kasus di SDN Kendangsari I dan II Surabaya (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya).

Romli, M. (2012). Strategi membangun metakognisi siswa SMA dalam pemecahan masalah matematika. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2/September).

Sahabuddin, E.S. (2018). Kerangka Acuan Model Pembelajaran Pendidikan Lingkungan Hidup Berbasis Educational Management Action-Portofolio (EMA Portofolio) Yang Inovatif Dan Terpadu.

Sihaloho, L., Rahayu, A., & Wibowo, L. A. (2018). Pengaruh Metakognitif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Melalui Efikasi Diri Siswa. Jurnal Ekonomi Pendidikan dan Kewirausahaan, 6(2), 121-136.

Sami, Mustofa. (2009). Elementary Student’s Metacognition adn Epistemological Beliefs Considering Science Achievement, Gender and Socioeconomic Status.8 (3), hlm 676.

Schraw, G., Crippen, K.J, & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting Self – regulation in Science Education : Metacognition as Part a Broader Perspective on Learning. Research in Science Education. 36 91-2), hlm. 11 – 139.

Suherman et. al. (2001). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Bandung.

Sumampouw, H. M. (2011). Keterampilan Metakognitif dan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi dalam Pembelajaran Genetika (Artikulasi Konsep dan Verifikasi Empiris). Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 4(2), 23-39.

Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). “Meta-Cognition Learning: Conceptual and Methodological Considerationsâ€. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3-14.

Zubaidah, Siti. (2016). Keterampilan Abad Ke-21: Keterampilan yang diajarkan Melalui Pembelajaran. Universitas Negeri Malang: Malang.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/ejpe.v8i1.2815

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Edunomic by http://jurnal.unswagati.ac.id/index.php/Edunomic

Edunomic : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Ekonomi Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan

Copyright © Edunomic : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Ekonomi Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan

All rights reserved. p-ISSN 2337-571X | e-ISSN 2541-562X