Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Hexagon terhadap Financial Statement Fraud

Anitaria Siregar, Etty Murwaningsari

Abstract


Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the influence of fraud factors of fraud hexagon (S.C.C.O.R.E) towards fraudulent financial statement. Fraudulent financial statement is measured by using Beneish M-Score Model. There are six variables of fraud hexagon in this study that are considered to have  influenced fraudulent financial statement. The variables consist of stimulus (financial stability), capability (competency), collusion (project with government), opportunity (effective monitoring), rationalization (historical restate frequency), and ego (company existence). The population are  manufacture companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2016 to 2020. The research samples are taken by purposive sampling with total observation 280. The results of the research show that stimulus (financial stability), capability (competency) and collusion (project with government) have a significant effect towards the fraudulent financial reporting, while opportunity (effective monitoring), rationalization (historical restate frequency) and ego (company existence) do not have a significant effect towards the fraudulent financial reporting. The implication of this research result is that the dimension of collusion (project with government) has a significant effect but with the negative coefisien, which means that the hyphotesis rejected. This result gives the implication that further analysis needs to be done for proxy used  for this dimension, as having project with government the likelihood for fraud is reduced. This research uses ineffective monitoring of audit committee as control variable.

Keywords: collusion; fraudulent financial statement;  fraud hexagon; fraud triangle; S.C.C.O.R.E.

Abstrak

Penelitian bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh dari faktor-faktor fraud hexagon (S.C.C.O.R.E) terhadap fraudulent financial statement. Fraudulent financial statement  diukur dengan menggunakan Beneish M-Score Model. Enam variabel fraud hexagon dalam penelitian ini dipertimbangkan mempengaruhi fraudulent financial statement. Variabel-variabel tersebut terdiri dari stimulus (financial stability), capability (competency), collusion (project with government), opportunity (effective monitoring), rationalization (historical restate frequency), dan ego (company existence). Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia untuk periode tahun 2016-2020. Sampel dalam penelitian ini diambil dengan menggunakan purposive sampling dengan total observasi 280. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan stimulus (financial stability), capability (competency) dan collusion (project with government) berpengaruh signifikan terhadap fraudulent financial reporting, sementara opportunity (effective monitoring), rationalization (historical restate frequency) dan ego (company existence) tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap fraudulent financial reporting. Implikasi dari penelitian ini adalah dari hasil dimensi kolusi (project with government) menunjukkan hasil yang berpengaruh signifikan dengan koefisien yang negatif, sehingga hipotesis untuk elemen ini, ditolak. Hasil ini memberikan implikasi untuk pengembangan proksi pengukuran baru dalam dimensi ini, karenakondisi perusahaan memiliki proyek dengan pemerintah ternyata kecenderungan untuk melakukan fraud-nya berkurang. Penelitian ini menggunakan variabel kontrol ineffective monitoring of audit committee.

Kata kunci: collusion; fraudulent financial statement; fraud hexagon; fraud triangle; S.C.C.O.R.E.


References


Albrecht, C., & Albrecht, C. (2008). The Nature of Financial Statement Fraud. Internal Auditing, 23(4), 22-27.

Amat, Oriol. (2019). Detecting Accounting Fraud Before It's Too Late, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 2019. ProQuest Ebook Central.

Arens, Alvin A., Elder, Randal J., Beasley, Mark S /., Hogan , Chris E. (2017). Auditing And Assurance services - An integrated Approach. sixteenth edition. Pearson.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2020). Report to The Nations: 2018 Global Study On Occupational Fraud and Abuse.https://acfepublic.s3-us-west- 2.amazonaws.com/2020-Report-to-the-Nations.pdf.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) Indonesia. (2020). Survai Fraud Indonesia 2019. ACFE Indonesia Chapter. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/SURVEI-FRAUD-INDONESIA-2019.pdf.

Christian, Natalis. (2022). Efek Mediasi Kesulitan Keuangan dalam Mendeteksi Corporate Fraud di Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 6(1), 44–69. Retrieved from http://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/jka.

CNBC Indonesia. (2021a). Retrieved December 12, 2021 from Deretan Skandal Lapkeu di Pasar Saham RI, Indofarma-Hanson! (cnbcindonesia.com).

CNBC Indonesia. (2021b). Retrieved December 12, 2021 from Astaga! Ada 'Skandal' Dugaan Manipulasi Lapkeu Emiten Nih (cnbcindonesia.com).

CNBC Indonesia. (2018). Retrieved October 6, 2020 from https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20181004144351-4-36069/kasus-snp-finance-ojk-harap-ada-efek-jera-ke-akuntan-publik.

CNN Indonesia . (2019). Retrieved October 6, 2020 from https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20190430174733-92-390927/kronologi-kisruh-laporan-keuangan-garuda-indonesia.

Desviana, Desviana. Basri , Yesi Mutia. Nasrizal, Nasrizal. (2020). Analisis Kecurangan pada Pengelolaan Dana Desa dalam Perspektif Fraud Hexagon. Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia. P.50-73. Vol. 3, No. 1, 2020.

Farooq, M. U., Kazim, I., Usman, M., & Latif, I. (2018). Corporate governance and audit fees: Evidence from a developing country. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 12(1), 94-110.

Fitri, F. A., Syukur, M., & Justisa, G. (2019). Do the fraud triangle components motivate fraud in Indonesia? Australasian Accounting Business & Finance Journal, 13(4), 63-72,63A-63B.

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v13i4.5.

Ghozali, Iman. (2020). 25 Grand Theory – 25 Teori Besar Ilmu Manajemen. Akuntansi dan Bisnis. Penerbit Yoga Pratama Semarang. ISBN:978-602-0896-51-9.

Handoko, B. L. (2021). Fraud Hexagon dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud Perusahaan Perbankan di Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 5(2), 176–192. Retrieved from http://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/jka.

Haqq, Ananda Putra Nindhita Aulia., Budiwitjaksono, Gideon Setyo., (2020). Fraud Pentagon for Detecting Financial Statement Fraud. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura. Vol. 22, No. 3, Desember 2019 – Maret 2020, pages 319 – 332.

Kompas.Com. (2019). Retrieved October 6, 2020 from https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2019/12/05/192430765/sederet-kasus-yang-menjerat-maskapai-garuda-indonesia-di-2019?page=all.

Liputan6.com. (2018). Retrieved October 6, 2020 from https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/3652720/nilai-pembobolan-dana-14-bank-oleh-snp-senilai-rp-24-triliun-versi-ojk.

Lokanan, M. E., & Aujla, I. (2021). Mapping the Individual and Structural Theories of Financial Crimes. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(2), 420-432. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2019-0165.

Nehme, R., Michael, A., & Haslam, J. (2020). Directors' monitoring role, ownership concentration and audit fees. Australasian Accounting Business & Finance Journal, 14(5), 3-25.

Omar, N., Said, R., & Zulaikha ‘Amirah Johari. (2016). Corporate crimes in malaysia: A profile analysis. Journal of Financial Crime, 23(2), 257-272. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JFC-05-2014-0020.

Ong, Alyssa S. J. (2022). Think First, Act Later, or Act First, Think Later: Does the Fraud Triangle Hold When Individuals are Impulsive? Journal of Forensic and Investigative Accounting. Volume 14: Issue 1. p. 11-38.

Ozcelik, Hakan. (2020). An Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Using The Fraud Diamond Theory Perspective: An Empirical Study on The Manufacturing Sector Companies Listed on The Borsa Istanbul. Emerald Publishing Limited.https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-375920200000102012.

Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (POJK). 2014. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 33/POJK.04/2014. Tentang Direksi dan Dewan Komisaris Emiten atau Perusahaan Publik.

Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (POJK). 2015. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 55 /pojk.04/2015 Tentang Pembentukan dan Pedoman Pelaksanaan Kerja Komite Audit.

Rahma, Dhea Violin,. Suryani ,Elly. (2019). Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor Fraud Triangle Terhadap Financial Statement Fraud. Jurnal Aset (Akuntansi Riset), 11 (2), 2019, 301-314.

Rani, A. (2018). Audit committee effectiveness: Relationship between audit committee characteristics and audit fees and non-audit service fees. Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research, 7(3), 35-44.

Ratmono, Dwi. Darsono, Darsono & Cahyonowati, Nur. (2020). Financial Statement Fraud Detection wth Beneish M-Score and Dechow F-Score Model: An Empirical Analysis of Fraud Pentagon Theory in Indonesia. International Journal of Financial Research. Vol. 11, No. 6. 155-164. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n6p154.

Sallal, F., Mohammad Ali, B. V., & Saei, M. J. (2021). Fraudulent Financial Reporting Motivations in Emerging Markets. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(3), 892-905. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-09-2020-0188.

Sari, Shinta Permata., Nugroho, Nanda Kurniawan. (2020). Financial Statements Fraud dengan Pendekatan Vousinas Fraud Hexagon Model: Tinjauan pada Perusahaan Terbuka di Indonesia. Proceedings of 1st Annual Conference on IHTIFAZ: Islamic Economics, Finance, and Banking (ACI-IJIEFB) 2020. P.409-430.

Shaio, Y. H., Chi-Chen, L., An-An, C., & Yen, D. C. (2017). Fraud detection using fraud triangle risk factors. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(6), 1343-1356. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9647-9.

Shonhadji, N. and Maulidi, A. (2021). The Roles of Whistleblowing System and Fraud Awareness as Financial Statement Fraud Deterrent. International Journal of Ethics and Systems. Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 370-389. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-09-2020-0140.

Skousen, J. C., Smith K. R., & Wright, J. C. (2009). Detecting and Predicting Financial Statement Fraud: The Effectivensess of The Fraud Triangle and SAS No. 99. Corporate and Firm Performance Advances in Financial Economics, 13, 53–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-3732(2009)000001300.

Sudaryono, Driya. (2021). Application of Fraud Pentagon for Detecting Symptoms of Shortfall Financial Statements. International Journal of Contemporary Accounting. Vol. 3 No. 1 July 2021: 25-44.

Tan, D. A. P., & Utami, I. (2021). Studi Eksperimental atas Kontrol Diri dan Gaya Hidup : Dampaknya Pada Niat Kecurangan. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 5(1), 16–33. Retrieved from http://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/jka.

Tickner, P., & Button, M. (2021). Deconstructing the Origins of Cressey’s Fraud Triangle. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(3), 722-731. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-10-2020-0204.

Tiffani, L., & Marfuah, M. (2015). Deteksi financial statement fraud dengan analisis fraud triangle pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di bursa efek indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing Indonesia, 19(2), 112-125. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol19.iss2.art3.

The Institute of Internal Auditors/ IIA. (2019). IIA Position Paper – Fraud and Internal Audit. https://na.theiia.org/about-ia/PublicDocuments/Fraud-and-Internal-Audit.pdf.

Tuanakotta, Theodorus. M. (2018). Akuntansi Forensik & Audit Investigatif. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Vona, Leonard W. (2008). “Fraud Risk Assessment: Building A Fraud Audit Programâ€. John Willey & Sons, Inc. Hoboken, New Jersey.

Vousinas, Georgios. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(1), 372-381. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128.

Waddell, C. (2016). Using network analysis to detect collusive fraud: Could notorious fraudsters have been caught in the act?: Certified public accountant. The CPA Journal, 86(3), 38-45.

Wang, Z., Chen, M.-H., Chin, C. L., & Zheng, Q. 2017, 'Managerial ability, political connections, and fraudulent financial reporting in China'. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 141-162.

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud: Certified public accountant. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38-42.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/jka.v6i2.6799

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Lisensi Creative Commons Web Analytics Web Analytics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lt. 2 Gedung Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Jalan Pemuda No.32, Sunyaragi, Kesambi, Kota Cirebon, Jawa Barat 45132

execute(); ?>