DIVERSION CONDUCTED BY THE PROSECUTOR IN THE CRIME OF THEFT WITH AGGRAVATION IN JUVENILE OFFENDERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33603/responsif.v14i1.9664Kata Kunci:
Diversion, Public Prosecutor, Child Offender, Aggravated TheftAbstrak
Diversion is an effort that must be carried out by law enforcement, both by Investigators, Public Prosecutors, and Judges, in order to protect children in conflict with the law. However, efforts to implement diversion must also be accompanied by considerations from Bapas who conduct research and assistance to children in conflict with the law. The purpose of this study is to determine the criminal law review of the diversion carried out by the Public Prosecutor in the crime of aggravated theft of child offenders, as well as to determine the juridical implications of the diversion carried out by the Public Prosecutor in the crime of aggravated theft of child offenders. The method used in this research is normative juridical method, with the nature of descriptive research, then data collection sourced from secondary data, and then the data is processed qualitatively. The results showed that: (1) The criminal law review of the diversion carried out by the Public Prosecutor in the crime of theft with aggravation on child perpetrators is basically not in accordance with the provisions in Article 7 paragraph (2) of the SPPA Law, because diversion can only be implemented with the provisions threatened with imprisonment under 7 (seven) years, while the three child perpetrators committed a criminal offense with aggravation stipulated in Article 363 paragraph (1) points 4 and 5 of the Criminal Code which carries a penalty of more than 7 (seven) years in prison. However, if seen from the provisions in Article 2 and Article 3 of the Child Protection Law, then of course diversion should be carried out by the Public Prosecutor, considering that the three child perpetrators have never committed a criminal offense before; (2) The juridical implications of the diversion carried out by the Public Prosecutor in the crime of theft with aggravation on child perpetrators, which resulted in the refusal of the Bapas to sign the diversion agreement on the grounds that the diversion effort has violated the provisions of Article 7 paragraph (2) of the SPPA Law
Referensi
Abintoro Prakoso, Pembaruan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, Yogyakarta: Laksbang Grafika, 2013.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).
Kusno Adi, Diversi Sebagai Upaya Alternatif Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Narkotika Oleh Anak, Malang: UMM Press, 2009.
Maidin Gultom, Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia, Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2008.
Muchsin, “Perlindungan Anak Dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif”, Jurnal Varia Peradilan Nomor 308 Tahun XXVI, Juli, Jakarta, 2011.
Okky Chahyo Nugroho, “Peran Balai Pemasyarakatan pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Ditinjau dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia”, Jurnal HAM, Volume 8 Nomor 2 Desember 2017, Jakarta: Kemenkumham, 2017.
Surat Edaran Jaksa Agung Muda Tindak Pidana Umum No. B-363/E/EJP/02/2010 tanggal 25 Februari 2010 tentang Petunjuk Teknis Penanganan Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum.
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.
Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Acep Yopan Apriana, Sefa Martinesya, Bustomi Bustomi
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal HUKUM RESPONSIF, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati. Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Jurnal HUKUM RESPONSIF, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Jurnal HUKUM RESPONSIF the sole responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
