THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ELECTION SUPERVISORY AGENCY'S AUTHORITY IN HANDLING MONEY POLITICS IN THE 2024 ELECTION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE QUALITY OF DEMOCRACY

Authors

  • Mochamad Irfan Hadi Prayitno Swadaya Gunung Jati University, West Java, Indonesia
  • Moh. Sigit Gunawan Swadaya Gunung Jati University, West Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33603/responsif.v18i1.12661

Keywords:

Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu), effectiveness of authority, money politics, 2024 elections, quality of democracy

Abstract

Background.. The utilization of monetary influence remains a significant issue in the electoral process in Indonesia, as it threatens the foundations of honest, equitable, and principled democracy. The Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu), functioning as an electoral oversight body, has the power to prevent, monitor, address, and rectify electoral infractions, including monetary manipulation. Nonetheless, in practice, numerous impediments continue to affect the efficacy of this authority.

Aims. This research aims to evaluate the nature of Bawaslu's jurisdiction in addressing money politics during the 2024 election, assess the efficacy of its execution, and investigate its consequences for democratic standards in Indonesia.

Methods. This research employs an empirical legal methodology (socio-legal inquiry) via a case study technique. Information was obtained from literature reviews of statutes and regulations, as well as official records, and corroborated by empirical data collected through interviews with Bawaslu. The examination is conducted qualitatively by correlating relevant legislative statutes with practical evidence concerning the management of monetary political practices in the 2024 election.

Result. The findings of the research indicate that Bawaslu's jurisdiction is an attribution authority conferred directly by Law Number 7 of 2017, encompassing preventive, supervisory, administrative, coordinating, and advisory powers. The standard execution of this authority aligns with legal stipulations; however, its efficacy remains subpar due to insufficient evidence, minimal public engagement in reporting infractions, a transactional political environment, and the restricted jurisdiction of Bawaslu in the investigative and prosecutorial phases, which fall under the purview of the Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Gakkumdu Center).

Conclusion. These conditions have an impact on the quality of democracy, especially in lowering the integrity of elections, freedom of choice, legitimacy of election results, and accountability in the administration of government.

Implementation. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the authority of Bawaslu, increase coordination between law enforcement agencies, and increase public legal awareness in order to realize honest, fair, and integrity elections

Author Biography

Moh. Sigit Gunawan, Swadaya Gunung Jati University, West Java

Law Faculty

References

Election Supervisory Board. (2024). Report on the performance of election supervision in 2024. Jakarta: Bawaslu of the Republic of Indonesia.

Election Supervisory Board of the Republic of Indonesia. (2024, February 27). Registering 1,023 findings and reports, Bawaslu found 479 alleged violations of the 2024 election. https://www.bawaslu.go.id/id/berita/registrasi-1023-temuan-dan-laporan-bawaslu-temukan-479-dugaan-pelanggaran-pemilu-2024.

Beccaria, C. (1986). On Crimes and Punishments (D. Young, trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. (Original work published 1764). https://www.hackettpublishing.com/on-crimes-and-punishments

Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/259394

Bentham, J. (1995). The Panopticon Writings. London: Verso. (Original work published 1791).

https://www.versobooks.com/products/149-the-panopticon-writings

Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia. (2017). Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. Statute Book of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2017 Number 182.

Fahmi, K. (2020). Election law enforcement system and the challenges of money politics supervision in Indonesia. Constitutional Journal, 17(2), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1724

Firmansyah, R., & Huda, N. (2021). Money politics in elections: Challenges of supervision and law enforcement by Bawaslu. Journal of Law IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 28(3), 481–503. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss3.art4

Habibi, M., & Wicaksono, D. A. (2022). The effectiveness of Bawaslu's supervision of money politics practices in the election of regional heads. Journal of Political Research, 19(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v19i1.1024

Hidayat, A., & Ramadhan, G. (2023). Transactional political culture and weakening of the integrity of local democracy. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 27(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.84231

Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology. (2020). Guidelines for writing scientific papers and APA citations. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.

Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S. I. (Eds.). (2007). Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/patrons-clients-and-policies

Norris, P. (2015). Why Elections Fail. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/why-elections-fail

Prasetyo, T., & Setiawan, B. (2021). Clientelism and money politics in local elections in Indonesia. Journal of Political Discourse, 6(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v6i2.34567

President of the Republic of Indonesia. (2018). Presidential Regulation Number 68 of 2018 concerning the position, duties, functions, authorities, organization, and work procedures of the Election Supervisory Agency. Jakarta.

Riwanto, A. (2019). Election law enforcement and the future of Indonesian democracy. Journal of RechtsVinding, 8(3), 389–405.

Scott, J. C. (1972). Patron-client politics and political change in Southeast Asia. American Political Science Review, 66(1), 91–113. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/patronclient-politics

Downloads

Published

2026-08-06

Citation Check