PENDEKATAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PRIVATISASI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA (BUMN) RUMAH SAKIT

Endang Sutrisno

Sari


JURIDICAL APPROACH TO PRIVATIZATION OF STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES (BUMN) HOSPITAL

 

Development of society in the global era has impacted in all sides of lives, the world's borderless position puts the legal workings of the process activities through time and space. The existence of law referring to the destination is not only purely based on fairness and certainty but also to its utility. For what the law exists, must heed the achievement of the goal even if the three objectives are often positioned on the condition of an argument, which should take precedence.

Legal dimensions of corporate economic activity holds the main control, it will be very urgent if the issue of privatization of State Owned Enterprises (BUMN)  is become the study because it can result in view of the pros and cons in the community. Certain perceptions emerge the notion that privatization of (BUMN) as a-national behavior by selling the sovereignty of the State which is fitting to build community and alignments in the interest of the people. And considering existence and purpose of establishment of state enterprises under the State Constitution 45 must be able to reflect the needs of all levels of society to build society welfare. Law is the primary guardian in order to achieve privatization goals so that economic activities are not out of control, especially considering global economic development that carries shades of liberalization and global capitalism, profit is more prominent than the public interest. Especially considering the existence of a hospital that carries the value of humanity as a consideration that must remain in the realm of regulation that aims for the goodness of the wider community, including privatization efforts will not escape from it.

 

Key Word : Privatization, Law Objectives, Community Development

 


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Joni Emerzon (editor), 2007, Perspektif Hukum Bisnis Indonesia : Pada Era Globalisasi Ekonomi, Genta Press,Yogyakarta.

Munir Fuady, 1997, Hukum Bisnis dalam Teori dan Praktek : Buku Ke Empat, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Mansour Fakih, 2001, Sesat Pikir Teori Pembangunan Dan Globalisasi, Insist Press, Yogyakarta.

_______________, 2006, Hukum Dalam Jagat Ketertiban, UKI Press, Jakarta.

_______________, 2007, Biarkan Hukum Mengalir Catatan Kritis tentang Pergulatan Manusia dan Hukum, Kompas, Jakarta.

_______________, 2007, Mendudukkan Undang-Undang Dasar Suatu Pembahasan dari Optik Ilmu Hukum Umum, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

_______________, 2008, Negara Hukum yang Membahagiakan Rakyatnya, Genta Press, Yogyakarta.

_______________, 2009, Membangun Dan Merombak Hukum Indonesia Sebuah Pendekatan Lintas Disiplin, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta.

________________, 2009, Penegakan Hukum Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta.

________________,2009, Hukum Progresif Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta.

_________________, 2009, Lapisan-Lapisan dalam Studi Hukum, Bayumedia, Malang.

_________________, 2009, Hukum dan Perilaku, Hidup Baik adalah Dasar Hukum yang Baik, Kompas, Jakarta.

Franz Magnis Suseno, 1986, Perspektif : Etis Pembangunan, dalam kumpulan artikel Menguak Mitos-Mitos Pembangunan Telaah Etis Dan Kritis, Gramedia, Jakarta.

Gunawan Sumodiningrat, 2009, Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Bangsa Menanggulangi Kemiskinan dengan Prinsip Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, PT Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta.

Manfred B. Steger, 2005, Globalisme Bangkitnya Ideologi Pasar, Lafadl Pustaka, Yogyakarta.

Satjipto Rahardjo, 2006, Membedah Hukum Progresif, Kompas, Jakarta.

Sumber-Sumber Lain :

Majalah Investor, No.165-14, 24 Maret 2007, hlm.14.

Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Hukum dan Perubahan Masyarakat, No.7 Vol. 4-1997, hlm.3




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/responsif.v1i1.1157

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


##submission.copyrightStatement##

execute(); ?>