Ario Joko Sukmanto


This thesis discusses the evaluation of the implementation of the building permit service policy in Indramayu regency. This research is motivated by the phenomenon of the lack of awareness of the community who are building to take care of building permit (IMB), information provided to the public that violates the provisions stipulated in the Perda is still not well socialized, there are still complaints from the IMB Applicant regarding several requirements requested to be completed, especially those concerning technical recommendations from relevant technical agencies. In addition, complaints from the IMB Applicant also related to the technical and location recommendation requirements of the technical agencies which were not yet integrated in one place so that the IMB Aplicant had to go one by one. This research uses descriptive qualitative method, which is observing aspects of criteria related to the evaluation of IMB service policy by using the theory of William N. Dunn, namely;
Effectiveness, Efficiency, Adequacy, Equity, Responsiveness and Appropriateness. Then describe these aspects based on the facts obtained from the results of interviews in the field. Data collection techniques are done by indepth interviews, observation and documentation. Data analysis was performed using qualitative descriptive analysis with the following steps; data reduction, data display, data verification and conclusion drawing. The results showed that of the six evaluation criteria observed in general were going well and in accordance with the evaluation criteria according to William N. Dunn. However, from the results of the evaluation of the six criteria there are still notes that must be considered by the policy implementor, namely on the criteria; Effectiveness, Equity and Responsiveness. In the Effectiveness criteria, notes must be considered regarding the matter of the realization of the issuance of building permit (IMB) which still does not meet the target. In the Equity criteria, a note that must be considered is the socialization of the IMB which has not yet reached the village level. Finally, in the Responsiveness criteria, notes that must be considered are regarding the requirements of technical
recommendations from related agencies that must be fulfilled by the IMB Applicant where there are still complaints against several officials from relevant technical agencies concerning the matter of coordination.


evaluation of policy implementation; service; building permit (IMB)


Dye, Thomas R. 2002. Understanding Public Policy: Tenth Edition. Published by Prentice Hall

Dunn, William N. 2003. Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Edisi Kedua. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Danim, Sudarwan dan Darwis. 2003. Metode Penelitian Kebidanan: Prosedur, Kebijakan & Etik. Jakarta: EGC

Effendi, Sofian. 2000. Implementasi dan Evaluasi Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: MAP-UGM.

Miles, Matthew B., dan Huberman, A. Michael. 2009. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Penerjemah: Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas (UI-Press).

Moleong, Lexy J. 2000. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nugroho D, Riant. 2009. Kebijakan Publik: Formulasi, Implementasi, dan Evaluasi. Jakarta: Media Elex Komputindo.

Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2002 Tentang Bangunan Gedung

Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penataan Ruang

Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pelayanan Publik

Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 36 Tahun 2005 Tentang Peraturan Pelaksana UU No. 28 Tahun 2002 Tentang Bangunan Gedung

Peraturan Presiden RI Nomor 27 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu Di Bidang Penanaman Modal

Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor: 24/PRT/M/2007 Tentang Pedoman Teknis Izin Mendirikan Bangunan (IMB)

Peraturan Daerah Kab. Indramayu Nomor 7 Tahun 2018 Tentang Retribusi Perizinan Tertentu

Peraturan Daerah Kab. Indramayu Nomor 15 Tahun 2012 Tentang Bangunan Gedung

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/.v5i2.4899


  • There are currently no refbacks.
execute(); ?>