Pengaruh Whistleblowing Triangle terhadap Intensi dalam Melakukan Whistleblowing

Ilham Maulana Saud, Putri Febriana

Abstract


Abstract

The urgency to implement whistleblowing to identify and reveal the fraud is acknowledged by regulators all over the world. This research aims to determine of whistleblowing effect triangle, moral, or social incentives toward intention to do whistleblowing. By understanding the factors that generate the action of whistleblowing of fraud, we can come to the light of how it works. This study utilizes the quantity approach by using smartPLS version 3 as a data analysis tool. The technique of data collection is a questionnaire using a purposive sampling method by collecting samples of financial and accounting workers in companies in Indonesia that consist of 150 respondents in total. The results of the research showed that pressure, financial incentives, opportunities, rationalization, moral and social incentives positively and significantly affect the intention to do whistleblowing on financial and accounting staff who work in companies in Indonesia. The push factors that consist of financial incentives, opportunities, rationalization, moral and social incentives on this study when received by a person in disclosing fraud can affect the intensity of whistleblowing activities, so the higher push factors they have will be directly proportional to the person’s intentions in uncovering fraud.

Keywords: Whistleblowing triangle; Moral or social incentives; Intention in whistleblowing; Fraud disclosing

 

Abstrak

Urgensi penerapan whistleblowing untuk mengindentifikasi dan mengungkap fraud diakui oleh regulator di seluruh dunia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efek whistleblowing triangle, insentif moral dan sosial terhadap niat untuk melakukan whistleblowing. Dengan memahami faktor-faktor yang menghasilkan tindakan whistleblowing atas kecurangan, kita dapat mengetahui cara kerjanya. Penelitian ini menggunakan smartPLS versi 3 sebagai alat analisis data. Teknik pengumpulan data yang diterapkan adalah kuesioner dan menerapkan metode purposive sampling dengan mengumpulkan data staf keuangan maupun akuntansi yang berasal dari perusahaan-perusahaan di Indonesia yang berjumlah 150 responden. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa tekanan, insentif keuangan, peluang, rasionalisasi, insentif moral dan sosial berpengaruh signifikan terhadap niat melaksanakan whistleblowing pada staf keuangan dan akuntansi yang bekerja di perusahaan-perusahaan di Indonesia. Faktor pendorong terdiri dari tekanan, insentif keuangan, peluang, rasionalisasi, insentif moral dan sosial pada penelitian ini ketika diterima oleh seseorang dalam pengungkapan kecurangan dapat mempengaruhi intensitas kegiatan whistleblowing, sehingga semakin tinggi faktor pendorong yang dimiliki akan berbanding lurus dengan niat orang tersebut dalam mengungkap kecurangan.

Katakunci: Whistleblowing triangle; Insentif moral dan sosial, Intensi dalam melaksanakan whistleblowing; Pengungkapan kecurangan


References


Al-olimat, N. H. (2020). Whistleblowing Intentions Among Jordanian Auditors : The Role Of Financial Incentives And Authentic Leadership. 9(01).

Amabile, T. M., Mueller, J. S., Simpson, W. B., Hadley, C. N., Kramer, S. J., & Fleming, L. (2002). Time Pressure and Creativity in Organizations: A Longitudinal Field Study. 02–073.

Andon, P., Free, C., Jidin, R., Monroe, G. S., & Turner, M. J. (2018). The Impact of Financial Incentives and Perceptions of Seriousness on Whistleblowing Intention. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(1), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3215-6

Annisa, N. (2018). Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Intensi untuk Melakukan Whistle-blowing. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 1–22.

Apadore, K., Chin, C. Y., Ding, M., Qi, C., Yu-sinn, W. G., & Min, W. T. (2018). Factors affecting whistleblowing intention: an empirical study. 15(5), 108–118.

Arles, L. (2014). Faktor – Faktor Pendorong Terjadinya Fraud : Predator vs. Accidental Fraudster Diamond theory Refleksi Teori Fraud Triangle (Klasik) Suatu Kajian Teoritis Leardo. c, 1–43.

Badera, I. D. N., & Jati, I. K. (2020). Moral reasoning, whistleblowing intention, and audit judgement moderate the effect of ethical sensitivity on internal audit quality. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 7(6), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v7n6.1004

Brown, J. O., Hays, J., & Stuebs, M. T. (2016). Modeling accountant whistleblowing intentions: Applying the theory of planned behavior and the fraud triangle. Accounting and the Public Interest, 16(1), 28–56. https://doi.org/10.2308/apin-51675

Cushman, F. (2019). Rationalization is rational. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X19001730

Economictimes. (2021). Definition of “Whistleblower.â€

Esther, G. Y. (2020). The Effect Of Financial And Non Financial Incentives On Staff Performance . 22(6), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-2206112632

Farooqi, S., Abid, G., & Ahmed, A. (2017). How bad it is to be good: Impact of organizational ethical culture on whistleblowing (the ethical partners). Arab Economic and Business Journal, 12(2), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aebj.2017.06.001

Fauzi, A. (2021). Lembaga Perlindungan HAM.

Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Konsep, Teknik, Aplikasi Menggunakan SmartPLS 3.0 untuk Penelitian Empiris. Sleman : Badan Penerbitan Universitas Diponegoro.

Guthrie, C. P., & Taylor, E. Z. (2018). Whistleblowing on Fraud for Pay: Can I Trust You? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2555712

Hockley, L. (2021). Why is Whistleblowing Important?

Icek, A. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

Khan, J., Saeed, I., Zada, M., Ali, A., Contreras-barraza, N., Salazar-sep, G., & Vega-muñoz, A. (2022). Examining Whistleblowing Intention : The Influence of Rationalization on Wrongdoing and Threat of Retaliation.

Kumparan(2019): Fakta-fakta Skandal Laporan Keuangan Garuda

Latan, H., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. (2019). ‘Whistleblowing Triangle’: Framework and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(1), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3862-x

Lestari, R., & Yaya, R. (2017). Whistleblowing Dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Niat Melaksanakannya Oleh Aparatur Sipil Negara. Jurnal Akuntansi, 21(3), 336. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v21i3.265

Machado, M. R. R., & Gartner, I. R. (2018). The Cressey hypothesis (1953) and an investigation into the occurrence of corporate fraud: an empirical analysis conducted in Brazilian banking institutions. Revista Contabilidade e Financas, 29(76), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201803270

Mulia, T. W. (2016). Pengaruh Reward, Pofesionalisme Profesi , dan Moral Terhadap Intensitas Auditor Internal. 8(1), 33–52.

Prasetyaningsih, N. U. (2021). The Role of Moral Reasoning on the Effects of Incentive Schemes and Working Relationships on Whistleblowing : An Audit Experimental Study. 23(3), 215–236.

Pulungan, A. H. (2019). Pengaruh Religiusitas Dan Insentif Keuangan Terhadap Intensi Melakukan Whistleblowing Pada Faith-Based Organization. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 5(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.35590/jeb.v5i1.682

Seifert, D. L., Sweeney, J. T., Joireman, J., & Thornton, J. M. (2010). The influence of organizational justice on accountant whistleblowing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7), 707–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2010.09.002

Smaili, N., & Arroyo, P. (2019). Categorization of Whistleblowers Using the Whistleblowing Triangle. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3663-7

Sulistomo, A. (2012). Persepsi Mahasiswa Akuntansi terhadap Pengungkapan Kecurangan (Studi Empiris pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi UNDIP dan UGM). Skripsi.

Utami, I., & Libriani, E. W. (2015). Studi Eksperimental Tekanan Ketaatan dan Personal Cost: Dampaknya terhadap Whistleblowing. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 15(2), 106–119.

Zakaria, M., Rosnidah, I., Sari, E. N., & Nawi, N. A. (2020). Predicting Internal and External Whistleblowing Intentions : Comparative Study between Malaysian and Indonesian Police Forces. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(July), 44–66.

Zanaria, Y. (2016). Pengaruh Profesonalisme Audit, Intensitas Moral untuk Melakukan Tindakan Whistleblowing. Akuisisi:Jurnal Akuntansi, 12(1), 105–116.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/jka.v6i1.5512

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Lisensi Creative Commons Web Analytics Web Analytics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lt. 2 Gedung Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Jalan Pemuda No.32, Sunyaragi, Kesambi, Kota Cirebon, Jawa Barat 45132

execute(); ?>