IMPLEMENTATION OF CORPORATE CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY IN LAW ENFORCEMENT OF THE TRANSNATIONAL DIMENSION OF TRAFFICTING IN PERSONS

Reza Mahendra, Zulkarnein Koto, Marsudin Nainggolan

Sari


Trafficking in persons is a modern form of human slavery (Modern Day Slavery) and is one of the worst forms of treatment for violations of human dignity. In this study, the type of research used is normative juridical research with a law approach and a concept approach. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that the use of criminal law regarding corporate criminal liability in the crime of trafficking in persons with a transnational dimension at Unit IV Sub-Directorate III of the Directorate of General Crimes of the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Police is to harmonize the legal arrangements for the criminal act of trafficking in persons charged by the public prosecutor that there are in Article 10 of Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons with the theory put forward by experts related to the elements of criminal liability and the model of corporate criminal liability. The implementation of corporate criminal responsibility in law enforcement of the criminal act of trafficking in persons with an effective transnational dimension is one whose solution prioritizes the concept of restorative justice. The concept of restorative justice is the concept of resolving a particular crime that involves all interested parties to jointly seek a solution and at the same time find a solution in dealing with events after the crime has arisen and how to overcome its implications in the future.

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Andi Zainal Abidin, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Bagian Pertama, Alumni, Bandung,1987.

Bambang Sunggono, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, PT RajaGrafindo, Jakarta, 2003.

Barda Nawawi Arief, Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2007.

Eva Achjani Zulfa, Keadilan Restoratif, Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 2012.

I. S. Susanto, Kejahatan Korporasi, BP Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 1995.

Jimmy Joses Sembiring, Cara Menyelesaikan Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan (Negosiasi, Mediasi, Konsilisiasi Dan Arbitrase),Transmedia Pustaka, Jakarta, 2011.

Konsideran huruf a Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Tata Cara Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Oleh Korporasi.

Kristian, Hukum Pidana Korporasi: Kebijakan Integral (Integral Policy) Formulasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi di Indonesia, Nuansa Aulia, Bandung, 2014.

Kristian, Kebijakan Integral Formulasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi di

Indonesia, Nuansa Aulia, Bandung, 2014.

Mardjono Reksodiputro, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korporasi, UNDIP Press, Semarang,1989.

Moeljanto, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Edisi revisi, Renika Cipta, Jakarta, 2008.

Muladi dan Diah Sulistyani, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi (Corporate Criminal Responsibility), Bandung, PT Alumni, Edisi Kedua Cetakan Pertama, 2015.

Nana Riana, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orangâ€, Tesis Magister Hukum Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, 2016.

Nyoman Sarikat Putra Jaya, Hukum Pidana di Bidang Ekonomi, Cetakan Ketiga, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 2015.

P.A.F Lamintang, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia, Cetakan I, PT. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2014.

Penjelasan atas UU No. 21 Tahun 2007 tentang PTPPO

Riduan Syahran, Rangkuman Inti Sari Ilmu, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2008.

Satipto Rahardjo, Masalah Penegakan Hukum. Sinar Baru, Bandung, tt.

Tony Marshall, Restorative Justice: An Overview, Home Office Research Development and Statistic Directorate, London, 1999.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v6i2.7461

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


execute(); ?>